2003
DOI: 10.1080/07448480309595723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binge Drinking: Not the Word of Choice

Abstract: Educators and researchers strive to use terms that reflect a replicable measure of behavior. A term commonly used to describe drinking of a problematic nature is binge drinking. Binge drinking defines behavior by a number of drinks of an alcoholic beverage consumed in a space of time. The authors argue that the term does not describe drinking behavior that students believe is problematic. They claim that students define problem drinking not in terms of quantity, but rather by the outcome (and occasionally by f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extant literature has focused on the sociodemographic characteristics of college student drinkers, the rates of binge drinking, the reasons for this behavior, and its negative consequences. A variety of studies have documented the ubiquitous nature and prevalence of college binge drinking behavior (e.g., Dimeff et al 1995; Goodhart et al 2003; Naimi et al 2003; Wechsler et al 2002; Young et al 2005). Drawing on Wechsler et al’s (1994) original definition of “binge” drinking (five alcoholic drinks in a row for males, four drinks for females at least once in a two-week period) public health officials and social scientists have reported relatively stable rates of binge drinking among college students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant literature has focused on the sociodemographic characteristics of college student drinkers, the rates of binge drinking, the reasons for this behavior, and its negative consequences. A variety of studies have documented the ubiquitous nature and prevalence of college binge drinking behavior (e.g., Dimeff et al 1995; Goodhart et al 2003; Naimi et al 2003; Wechsler et al 2002; Young et al 2005). Drawing on Wechsler et al’s (1994) original definition of “binge” drinking (five alcoholic drinks in a row for males, four drinks for females at least once in a two-week period) public health officials and social scientists have reported relatively stable rates of binge drinking among college students.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way binge drinking is socially constructed among young people is almost in direct opposition to the way the same phenomenon is constructed in research and professional literature. The gap between young people's experiences and professional discourse threatens to thwart efforts to promote safer alcohol consumption practices, so much so that researchers and health professionals have recently been criticised for contributing to the failure of young people to identify binge drinking as harmful (Goodhart, Lederman, Stewart & Laitman, 2003). In order to overcome this problem and to design more effective public health messages that will resonate with the target audience it is necessary to have an in-depth understanding of the way young people construct drinking.…”
Section: Discourse Analysis and Alcohol And Other Drugs Research-on Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this problem and to design more effective public health messages that will resonate with the target audience it is necessary to have an in-depth understanding of the way young people construct drinking. In particular it is important to identify the types of discourses that normalise harmful patterns of consumption (Goodhart et al, 2003). The identification of these discursive constructions has important implications for current health promotion strategies (Gillies, 1999).…”
Section: Discourse Analysis and Alcohol And Other Drugs Research-on Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second issue concerns the data that are collected to measure binge drinking. Aside from the problems with definition discussed above there are, as has been noted elsewhere, numerous additional issues with how binge drinking is conceptualized and measured (DeJong, 2001;Goodhart et al, 2003). The GHS and therefore the SHS use two measures of alcohol consumption, average weekly consumption and consumption on the heaviest drinking day in the week prior to interview.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%