2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2004.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hystricognath rodents from the Pinturas Formation, Early–Middle Miocene of Patagonia, biostratigraphic and paleoenvironmental implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, different scholars have pointed out that typical Santacrucian mammals do occur in slightly older inland horizons, indicating that the Santacrucian SALMA probably extends to somewhat earlier ages. These include Andean and central Patagonian outcrops, as for example the upper succession of the eolian-volcaniclastic Pinturas Formation in the valley of the Pinturas River (Kramarz and Bellosi, 2005), and exposures at Lake Posadas/Puyrredón (Hatcher, 1903;Blisniuk et al, 2006), Río Chalia/Sehuén (Hatcher, 1903), Estancia El Carmen, Lake Cardiel, and Gobernador Gregores (Bown and Fleagle, 1993;De Barrio et al, 1994;Kramarz and Bellosi, 2005;Fleagle et al, 2012). Other localities with potential Santacrucian fossils are El Trébol and Camerón (Bordas, 1939), Meseta Latorre (Brandmayr, 1945), and the Cerro Boleadoras Formation in the valley of the Jeinimeni and Zeballos Rivers, south of Lake General Carrera/Buenos Aires (Ugarte, 1956;Vucetich, 1994;Scillato-Yané and Carlini, 1998.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Pansantacrucian Fossil Faunasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, different scholars have pointed out that typical Santacrucian mammals do occur in slightly older inland horizons, indicating that the Santacrucian SALMA probably extends to somewhat earlier ages. These include Andean and central Patagonian outcrops, as for example the upper succession of the eolian-volcaniclastic Pinturas Formation in the valley of the Pinturas River (Kramarz and Bellosi, 2005), and exposures at Lake Posadas/Puyrredón (Hatcher, 1903;Blisniuk et al, 2006), Río Chalia/Sehuén (Hatcher, 1903), Estancia El Carmen, Lake Cardiel, and Gobernador Gregores (Bown and Fleagle, 1993;De Barrio et al, 1994;Kramarz and Bellosi, 2005;Fleagle et al, 2012). Other localities with potential Santacrucian fossils are El Trébol and Camerón (Bordas, 1939), Meseta Latorre (Brandmayr, 1945), and the Cerro Boleadoras Formation in the valley of the Jeinimeni and Zeballos Rivers, south of Lake General Carrera/Buenos Aires (Ugarte, 1956;Vucetich, 1994;Scillato-Yané and Carlini, 1998.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Pansantacrucian Fossil Faunasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pinturan fauna (Pinturan association sensu Kramarz and Bellosi, 2005) was recognized in elements of the old 'Astrapothericulan' fauna of Ameghino (1906), a composite fossil assemblage recovered in the headwaters of the Pinturas River, lacking an accurate geographic and stratigraphic position (Ameghino, 1900(Ameghino, -1902(Ameghino, , 1906. Kramarz and Bellosi (2005) and middle successions of the Pinturas Formation (Bown and Larriestra, 1990;Bown and Fleagle, 1993;Fig. 1), and characterised it by its more ancestral constitution, bearing more primitive elements than those of the classic Santacrucian localities along the Atlantic Coast.…”
Section: An Overview Of the Pansantacrucian Fossil Faunasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Posteriormente, Ameghino (1904a) describió Astrapothericulus peninsulatus como proveniente de las "Capas con Notohippus" en Karaiken, Sin embargo, más tarde Ameghino (1906:228) indicó claramente que Astrapothericulus está ausente en las "capas con Notohippus". Estudios bioestratigráficos basados en marsupiales paleoténtidos (Bown & Fleagle, 1993) roedores histricognatos (Kramarz & Bellosi, 2005) y Litopterna indican que sólo las secuencias inferior y media de la Formación Pinturas son portadoras de una asociación de mamíferos distinta y más antigua que las conocidas para la Edad Mamífero Santacrucense, mientras que la secuencia superior contiene en su mayoría taxones típicamente santacrucenses, y sería correlacionable con los niveles más bajos de la Formación Santa Cruz en sus típicas localidades costeras y con los depósitos expuestos en Karaiken portadores de la fauna "Notohippidense". Estas correlaciones están además apoyadas por dataciones 40 Ar/ 39 Ar obtenidas del tope de la secuencia media de la Formación Pinturas y de la base de la Formación Santa Cruz en Monte León y Monte Observación (Fleagle et al, 1995).…”
Section: Distribuciónunclassified