1990
DOI: 10.1142/s0192415x90000204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypotensive Action of Salvia miltiorrhiza Cell Culture Extract

Abstract: Salvia miltiorrhiza cell culture extract (SCE) was shown to produce dose-dependent hypotensive response in normo-tensive rats. The mode of this hypotensive action was studied both in vivo and in vitro. This vasodepressor effect was not due to the presence of cations (potassium, calcium and magnesium) in the extract. In pharmacological antagonist studies, the hypotensive effect was shown not being mediated via the alpha-, beta-adrenoceptors, histamine receptors and autonomic ganglion; nor via direct vasodilatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As clearly shown in the results, the drug slightly decreased the sinoatrial rate and significantly increased the coronary blood flow, but hardly affected the developed tension of the papillary muscle. Similar pharmacological profiles have been reported for the respective crude drugs, [3][4][5][6][7] but it should be noted that the effect on the coronary blood flow was detected with a 10-fold reduced dose than that which produced the other effects, a result that has not been reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As clearly shown in the results, the drug slightly decreased the sinoatrial rate and significantly increased the coronary blood flow, but hardly affected the developed tension of the papillary muscle. Similar pharmacological profiles have been reported for the respective crude drugs, [3][4][5][6][7] but it should be noted that the effect on the coronary blood flow was detected with a 10-fold reduced dose than that which produced the other effects, a result that has not been reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…1,2 The mixture can be administered intravenously or intramuscularly using its ampoule formulation. In previous experimental studies using rats and rabbits, Salvia miltiorrhiza exerted negative chronotropic, positive inotropic and coronary vasodilator effects, [3][4][5] and Dalbergia odorifera has been reported to possess a potent vasorelaxant action. 6,7 However, information regarding the cardiac effects of the combination of Salvia miltiorrhiza and Dalbergia odorifera is still limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Danshen had been shown to produce dose-related hypotension in the rat that was inhibited by atropine, propranolol, and a mixture of chlorpheniramine plus cimetidine (Lei and Chiou, 1986a), suggesting the roles of muscarinic receptors, ␤-adrenoceptors, and histamine receptors in mediating the effect. However, another study showed that the hypotensive effect of Danshen was not blocked by propranolol, or pyrilamine plus cimetidine, but was inhibited by atropine and potentiated by captopril, indicating the involvement of muscarinic receptors and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition but not ␤-adrenoceptors or histamine receptors (Li et al, 1990). Danshen was also effective in relaxing the noradrenaline-precontracted rat aorta (Kamata et al, 1993), an effect which was blocked by the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N G -monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA), suggesting an endothelium-dependent mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They include anti-lipid peroxidation of low-density lipoprotein [6], a dose-dependent hypotensive action [7,8] with positive inotropic and negative chronotropic effect [7], vasodilatation of coronary arteries [8], improved renal function in animal studies [9] and inhibition of platelet aggregation in vitro [10]. However, the pharmacodynamic effect as well as potentially serious drugs interactions of danshen have not been well studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%