1966
DOI: 10.1136/adc.41.217.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypoglycaemia and temporary hyperglycaemia in infants of low birth weight for materity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Haworth and McRae (1965) who studied 14 cases, and Chance and Bower (1966) who studied 7 cases, found evidence of possible cerebral damage in 12% of such infants on follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both Haworth and McRae (1965) who studied 14 cases, and Chance and Bower (1966) who studied 7 cases, found evidence of possible cerebral damage in 12% of such infants on follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of hypoglycemia shown by previous studies in preterm infants were 67% by Lubchenco and Bard, [13] 4.3% by Chance & Brower, [14] 15% by Fluge, [15] 3-15% by Hawdon, [16] 12.8% by Singhal et al [17] Harris and Weston found 51% incident of hypoglycemia on study of high risk neonates. [18] Information on the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia in developing countries is very limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…More recently, with the introduction of reliable methods for true glucose estimation (Acharya and Payne, 1965) evidence has accumulated that neonatal hypoglycaemia is not always a benign condition and that when it is profound and prolonged enough to produce clinical manifestations it is often followed by death or brain damage (Stevens, 1965;Anderson et al, 1966;Chance and Bower, 1966;Comblath et al, 1959;Haworth and McRae, 1965;Brown and Wallis, 1963;Raivio and Hallman, 1968). Moreover the custom of withholding feeds from low birth-weight babies seems to have increased the morbidity from C.N.S.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%