2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypofractionated Regional Nodal Irradiation for Women With Node-Positive Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The median follow-up time was 64 months (range, 11 to 88 months), and the 5-year OS, DFS, locoregional recurrence (LRR)-free survival, and distant metastasis (DM)-free survival was 86.6, 84.4, 93.9 and 83.1%, respectively. During study follow-up, no acute symptomatic pneumonitis, cardiac events, brachial plexopathy or rib fractures occurred, and the incidence of grade 2-4 lymphedema was 5.8% [48]. The above findings suggest that the HFRT schedule may be acceptable in breast cancer patients who require RNI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The median follow-up time was 64 months (range, 11 to 88 months), and the 5-year OS, DFS, locoregional recurrence (LRR)-free survival, and distant metastasis (DM)-free survival was 86.6, 84.4, 93.9 and 83.1%, respectively. During study follow-up, no acute symptomatic pneumonitis, cardiac events, brachial plexopathy or rib fractures occurred, and the incidence of grade 2-4 lymphedema was 5.8% [48]. The above findings suggest that the HFRT schedule may be acceptable in breast cancer patients who require RNI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…A higher dose per treatment fraction might increase the risk of toxicities in the setting of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) [46], but hypofractionated RNI was not observed to increase toxicity in one randomized clinical trial [12]. Two recent studies reported that the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated RNI were acceptable [47,48]. One was based on UK START trials, with 864/5861 patients who experienced adjuvant lymphatic radiotherapy (LNRT) (PMRT 202/864, 23.4%) assessed using the EORTC QLQ-BR23 scale, protocol-specific questions and by physicians [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ultrahypo‐fractionated scheme, delivering a dose of 28/30‐Gy in once weekly fractions over 5 weeks or 26‐Gy in 5 daily fractions over 1 week as per the FAST and FAST Forward trials, should be considered and discussed on a case‐by‐case basis (patients requiring RT with N‐negative tumors that do not require a boost). Radiation boost on the tumor bed does not provide any benefit in OS and can be omitted for patients > 40 years without risk factors (LVI, high grade, hormone‐negative and positive surgical margins) 3,4 …”
Section: Priority Chemotherapy Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the morbidity associated with radiation plexopathy in the setting of chemotherapy‐induced neuropathy is immensely more severe than either single entity alone. Despite attempts to decrease damage to the brachial plexus by adjusting the tangents and fractions of radiation, these complications are at times unavoidable as seen in patients receiving high dose boost therapy, intraoperative radiation therapy, or salvage radiotherapy to previously treated areas . Unfortunately, other conservative measures including hyperbaric oxygen and combination pentoxifyllin‐tocopherol therapy have not been proven to be beneficial in the amelioration of RIBP …”
Section: Radiation‐induced Brachial Plexopathymentioning
confidence: 99%