2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium - IGARSS 2013
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2013.6721346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral target detection with sparseness constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residual between the test sample and the reconstruction in the feature space is then computed according to (15) by…”
Section: B Kernelization Of Srbbhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The residual between the test sample and the reconstruction in the feature space is then computed according to (15) by…”
Section: B Kernelization Of Srbbhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To strengthen the performance of the LMM, sparsity representation-based detection methods have been developed, including the sparsity-based target detector (STD) [13], the joint sparse detector (JSD) [14], and the algorithm in [15]. These detection methods linearly model a test sample as a linear mixture of a number of training samples from target and background dictionaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this remarkable characteristic, it has been investigated for various applications, such as target detection, mineral exploration, environmental monitoring, medical detection, etc. [1][2][3][4][5][6] In the analysis of hyperspectral imagery, spectral unmixing, which can identify physical construction of each pixel [7][8] , has gained great attention. Spectral unmixing can be either linear or non-linear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%