2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2017.8296612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral image denoising based on global and non-local low-rank factorizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conduct several groups of experiments on both simulated and real images to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method compared with some existing typical algorithms. The following representative HSI denoising methods are selected as competitors, i.e., low-rank matrix recovery (LRMR) [18], TV-regularized low-rank matrix factorization (LRTV) [31], fast hyperspectral image denoising based on low-rank and sparse representations (FastHyDe) [46], global matrix factorization and to local tensor factorizations method (GLF) [41], spatial-spectral total variation regularized local low-rank matrix recovery (LLRGTV) [37], Moreau-enhanced total variation regularized local low-rank matrix recovery (LLRMTV) [43], and non-local meets global (NM-meet) denoising paradigm [42]. LRMR is one of the representative methods to recover HSI by the global low rank and sparse optimization.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conduct several groups of experiments on both simulated and real images to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method compared with some existing typical algorithms. The following representative HSI denoising methods are selected as competitors, i.e., low-rank matrix recovery (LRMR) [18], TV-regularized low-rank matrix factorization (LRTV) [31], fast hyperspectral image denoising based on low-rank and sparse representations (FastHyDe) [46], global matrix factorization and to local tensor factorizations method (GLF) [41], spatial-spectral total variation regularized local low-rank matrix recovery (LLRGTV) [37], Moreau-enhanced total variation regularized local low-rank matrix recovery (LLRMTV) [43], and non-local meets global (NM-meet) denoising paradigm [42]. LRMR is one of the representative methods to recover HSI by the global low rank and sparse optimization.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection-based method is first presented by Zhuang and Bioucas-Dias [40] for Gaussian and Poissonian noise removal. In [41], low-rank tensor factorization is further introduced into the subspace representation framework for HSI self-similar property enhancement. He et al [42] transfer the non-local denoising to the projected HSI instead of the original spectral dimension to reduce processing cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As images in eigen-space (i.e., linear combinations of original bands), rows of Z have the same characteristic, i.e., self-similarity, as the original image [5]. Self-similarity of rows of Z is exploited here for solving problem (12). Instead of investing efforts in tailoring regularizers promoting self-similar images, we use directly a state-of-the-art denoiser applied to Z t .…”
Section: Cost Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can shrink the transformation coefficients to attenuate the noise and invert the transform to generate image estimates. Furthermore, it is expected that the sparser the representation is, the more Gaussian noise we can remove [11], [12] from transform domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation