2020
DOI: 10.1117/1.jrs.14.034507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral estimation of soil composition contents based on kernel principal component analysis and machine learning model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although KPCA was selected 12 times as the best dimension reduction techniques, it possessed the worst results 54 times per 100 repetitions and then the advantages of using kernel was not confirmed in this study. (Lin et al 2020) reported that the machine learning models combined with KPCA were effective for estimating soil composition contents, however, the advantages of KPCA were not confirmed for chlorophyll content estimation from Zizania Latifolia. The clear relationships between chlorophyll content and reflectance over green peak and rededge have been used for estimating chlorophyll content from reflectance (Sims and Gamon 2002) and then it was not effective to express their relationships using non-liner models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although KPCA was selected 12 times as the best dimension reduction techniques, it possessed the worst results 54 times per 100 repetitions and then the advantages of using kernel was not confirmed in this study. (Lin et al 2020) reported that the machine learning models combined with KPCA were effective for estimating soil composition contents, however, the advantages of KPCA were not confirmed for chlorophyll content estimation from Zizania Latifolia. The clear relationships between chlorophyll content and reflectance over green peak and rededge have been used for estimating chlorophyll content from reflectance (Sims and Gamon 2002) and then it was not effective to express their relationships using non-liner models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, 1, 2, 3, and 4 were used to indicate the degree of possible coal-gas outburst risk levels in the mine, where 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicate that no coal-gas outburst will occur (0 m 3 /t), the risk of coal-gas outburst disasters is small (0-5 m 3 /t), coal-gas outburst disasters will generally occur (5-10 m 3 /t), and serious coal-gas outburst disasters will occur (10 m 3 /t or more), respectively. KPCA [36,37] is mainly used to address nonlinear complex problems. It essentially employs a nonlinear function with extremely high nonlinear-processing capability, through which the introduced function maps a large amount of complex information in the original space to linearly divisible high-dimensional data.…”
Section: Selection Of Mutagenic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%