2018
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperandrogenism controversy in elite women’s sport: an examination and critique of recent evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, doping was excluded by doping tests. Sönksen et al note from our study that the athletes had comparable serum levels of testosterone with the controls and that there was no correlation between testosterone and physical performance in the athletes 3. However, they ignore the fact that we found increased serum levels of several precursor androgens including dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the athletes, compared with the controls.…”
Section: Eklund Et Al Studycontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, doping was excluded by doping tests. Sönksen et al note from our study that the athletes had comparable serum levels of testosterone with the controls and that there was no correlation between testosterone and physical performance in the athletes 3. However, they ignore the fact that we found increased serum levels of several precursor androgens including dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the athletes, compared with the controls.…”
Section: Eklund Et Al Studycontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The main criticisms expressed about the data used and our statistical analysis were (1) our ‘concentration’ on free testosterone (fT) rather than total testosterone (T)3 (presumably because the T results were only presented in the Internet version of the paper), (2) the fact that 17.3% of the athletes were sampled at both World Championships (Daegu and Moscow),3 (3) the fact that no correlation analysis was performed other than comparison of fT or T tertiles,3 (4) the absence of statistical comparison between a group with high T levels and a group with normal T levels4 and (5) the lack of adjustment for multiple comparisons (suggesting that the significant differences observed in our study could have happened by chance) 5…”
Section: Bermon and Garnier Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the new policy gave its rationale for this new upper limit in the final "End Notes" section, using testosterone as the singular determinant of sex categorization is inconsistent with medical practices, which use a multitude of markers to do so, such as internal/external genitals, gonads, and chromosomes (Karkazis, 2008;Pieper, 2016). Moreover, several scholars have pointed out irrefutable problems with the research methods, analysis of data, and conclusions drawn from the Bermon and Garnier (2017) study, thus invalidating the study, and calling into question the ethicality of the new 2018 IAAF policy (Franklin, Betancurt, & Camporesi, 2018;Karkazis & Carpenter, 2018;Menier, 2018;Pielke, 2018;Posbergh, 2018;Sönksen et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Newest 2018 Iaaf Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have critiqued the study’s methodology, highly selective sample size (which seemingly included female athletes who had doped), and statistical processing [65-67]. Chand is unable to challenge the policy as she competes in the 100- and 200-m races, events not included in the new rules.…”
Section: Athletes and Hyperandrogenemiamentioning
confidence: 99%