“…As low weight has become one of the most urgent targets for both vehicles and airplanes in meeting customer demands and government regulations for energy efficiency, the situation can be improved with the implementation of CFRP composites because of their many advantages in terms of high strength-to-density ratio and good fatigue resistance. The complexity derives from different failure mechanisms, which are influenced by several factors according to previous studies: (1) mechanical properties of the material components, such as fibre, matrix, and fibre-matrix interface 11 ; (2) fibre orientation and fibre volume fraction 12,13 ; and (3) manufacturing defects and material aging due to the extreme working conditions (eg, fibre defects, 14 voids, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and mechanical degradation due to hygrothermal aging 15 or ultraviolet radiation 16 ). i, sample after n, cycles; [σ t ], = tensile strength; [σ c ], = compressive strength; a, = normalized stress amplitude; q, = normalized mean stress; c, = ratio between compressive strength and tensile strength; A, f, = constants associated with material; γ(v v ), = intercept of S − N, curve with vertical axis (for composite with void content of v v , ); k(v v ), = slope of S − N, curve (for composite with void content of v v , ); σ max , σ min , = maximum and minimum stress of cyclic load; D, = fatigue damage index; E 0 , = initial modulus; E(N), = residual modulus of the N th , cycle; E(N f ), = modulus at final fracture; δ(u, v v ), φ i (u, v v ), = functions related to the characteristics of damage accumulation (i∈, 1,2) done to investigate the mechanical properties of polymer composites; however, some of the work revealed that the voids have an impact on the mechanical properties, especially fatigue performance.…”