1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.29.3398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrostatic-pressure dependence of bound excitons in GaP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E − is taken as the "band-gap" energy and compared with the peak value in pressure dependent EL measurements. E N was found from photocurrent ͑PC͒ measurements ͑as in Peternai et al 10 ͒ and determined to be 2.21 eV, consistent with other findings 2,11 and shows negligible change with pressure, as previously observed 12 for isolated nitrogen impurities in GaP and calculated theoretically. 3 It is clearly seen in Fig.…”
Section: ͑1͒supporting
confidence: 89%
“…E − is taken as the "band-gap" energy and compared with the peak value in pressure dependent EL measurements. E N was found from photocurrent ͑PC͒ measurements ͑as in Peternai et al 10 ͒ and determined to be 2.21 eV, consistent with other findings 2,11 and shows negligible change with pressure, as previously observed 12 for isolated nitrogen impurities in GaP and calculated theoretically. 3 It is clearly seen in Fig.…”
Section: ͑1͒supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The C CB is found above the Xxy CB for all composition range, in agreement with the results of Prieto et al 26 for the case of GaAs strained layer on GaP(001) which is observed slightly indirect near the X-point. The N-level is insensitive to strain as in reported previous works 27,28 and lies below the CB of strained GaAsP whatever the content. Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The energy of the N localized state was set to be at E N ~ 2.15eV with a small pressure dependence of 1.2 meV/kbar. This energy location and pressure dependence are consistent with the average values for the variety of bound exciton lines in dilute N-doped GaP observed in previous reports [5,80]. Although X states could be expected to be more concentrated than Γ states on the group V sites (where N substitutes), the X-N coupling is much weaker than the Γ-N coupling.…”
Section: State Broadening and Related Effectssupporting
confidence: 91%