2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobicity, Freezing Delay, and Morphology of Laser-Treated Aluminum Surfaces

Abstract: Until recently, superhydrophobicity was considered as a hint to predict surface icephobicity, an association of concepts that is by no means universal and that has been proven to depend on different experimental factors and material properties, including the actual morphology and chemical state of surfaces. This work presents a systematic study of the wetting and freezing properties of aluminum Al6061, a common material widely used in aviation, after being subjected to nanosecond pulsed IR laser treatments to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(185 reference statements)
4
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, if the droplet is placed on a surface with a structured morphology in the Cassie–Baxter wetting regime, air will be trapped below the water droplet, thereby minimizing the contact area between the surfaces of the substrate and water droplet. The air trapped in the surface cavities is a poor thermal conductor and, together with the reduction of the contact area, will considerably hinder the heat transfer between the substrate and the liquid, significantly delaying the freezing time of the droplet. The low hysteresis CA (7°) along the high CA (160°) displayed by the PFPE-modified rough aluminum reveals that the droplet on this surface is in the Cassie–Baxter wetting regime, preventing the water penetration between the surface topography features and trapped air pockets and delaying the frost formation process. Despite the heterogeneous ice nucleation theory, which establishes that a critical radius of ice nuclei smaller than the size of the surface features allows spontaneous ice growth, and an ice nucleus radius of 4.5 nm calculated at −10 °C, significantly smaller than the size of the surface features on the rough aluminum (see Figures , S2 and Table S1), the substantial increase in the freezing delay time observed on the PFPE-modified rough aluminum, is attributed to the surface topography and to the small solid–liquid contact area and air pockets entrapped on the hierarchical micro/nanostructure (hindering the heat transfer), providing a low rate for ice nucleation and growth as was previously described in refs and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, if the droplet is placed on a surface with a structured morphology in the Cassie–Baxter wetting regime, air will be trapped below the water droplet, thereby minimizing the contact area between the surfaces of the substrate and water droplet. The air trapped in the surface cavities is a poor thermal conductor and, together with the reduction of the contact area, will considerably hinder the heat transfer between the substrate and the liquid, significantly delaying the freezing time of the droplet. The low hysteresis CA (7°) along the high CA (160°) displayed by the PFPE-modified rough aluminum reveals that the droplet on this surface is in the Cassie–Baxter wetting regime, preventing the water penetration between the surface topography features and trapped air pockets and delaying the frost formation process. Despite the heterogeneous ice nucleation theory, which establishes that a critical radius of ice nuclei smaller than the size of the surface features allows spontaneous ice growth, and an ice nucleus radius of 4.5 nm calculated at −10 °C, significantly smaller than the size of the surface features on the rough aluminum (see Figures , S2 and Table S1), the substantial increase in the freezing delay time observed on the PFPE-modified rough aluminum, is attributed to the surface topography and to the small solid–liquid contact area and air pockets entrapped on the hierarchical micro/nanostructure (hindering the heat transfer), providing a low rate for ice nucleation and growth as was previously described in refs and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11,12 In addition, in a recent article, we reported on the application of nanosecond laser treatment on aeronautical aluminum alloy supports for the development anti-icing surfaces covered with a CF x polymer. 61 The linear patterning structure of the laser-ablated substrate is reported in the Supporting Information Figure S4. Figure S4 (see also Figure 4a) gathers SEM micrographs at different magnifications presenting the 3D-ONF(400 nm) growth on the ns-laser treated substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser treatments to infiltrate the Ag into the MAO coating were performed using two different lasers in Laser Beam Scan (LBS) mode: an ns n-IR Yb fiber laser and a 300 ps UV laser. The laser beam scan process has been described elsewhere [22,23]. The first laser treatment was performed using the following parameters: a maximum power of 20 W, wavelength of 1 μm, spot size of 36 μm and pulse duration from 4 ns to 200 ns.…”
Section: Laser Induced Silver Infiltration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%