Hydrophilic microporous PES membranes prepared by PES/PEG/DMAc casting solutions

Abstract

Microporous poly(ether sulfones) (PES) membranes were prepared via phase inversion using poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) as additive and N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) as solvent. Thermodynamic of the casting solutions was studied by coagulation value while precipitation rate was observed by light transmittance measurement. It was found that casting solution with PEG200 as additive was thermodynamically less stable than those with PEG400 and PEG600 as additive and easier to cause phase separation in exposure time. With the increase of PEG200 concentration, the casting solution became thermodynamically less stable and easier to cause phase separation in exposure time, but precipitation rate during immersion precipitation decreased because of the increased viscosities. ATR-FTIR spectra and TGA curves showed that the membranes prepared using PEG200 as additive had less PEG residual than those of PEG400 and PEG600, but it showed better permeation performance than that prepared using PEG400 and PEG600 as additive. With the increase of PEG200 concentration from 30 to 70 wt %, the cross section structure changed from macrovoid to sponge-like, micropores with a mean pore size around 0.1 lm began to form on the top surface. When the PEG200 concentration is 60 wt %, the pure water flux was 1845 L m 22 h 21 bar 21, which is the highest value. As the PEG200 concentration increased from 30 to 60 wt %, the contact angles decreased from 82.18 to 58.28. As the addition amount of PEG200 increased, the residual PEG made the prepared membranes more hydrophilic.

Preparation of a poly(vinyl chloride) ultrafiltration membrane through the combination of thermally induced phase separation and non‐solvent‐induced phase separation

“…With the properties of PEG 600 and the casting solution and the expected membrane structure, the content of PEG 600 was fixed at 17.2 wt %. This was a compromise value based on the work of others who found that with increasing additive content, the viscosity of the casting solution increased and, at the same time, the membrane structure changed from fingerlike pores to spongy pores.…”

PVDF–TiO2 composite hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes prepared by TiO2 sol–gel method and blending method

“…Mean pore radius r m (μm) was determined by the filtration velocity method. According to the Guerout–Elford–Ferry equation, r m could be calculated30: where η was the water viscosity (8.9 × 10 −4 Pa s), l was the membrane thickness (m) (namely the differential value between external radius and inner radius of the hollow fiber membrane), Q was the volume of the permeate water per unit time (m 3 s −1 ), A was the effective area of the membrane (m 2 ), and Δ P was the operational pressure (0.1 MPa).…”

Preparation and characterization of nano-chitin whisker reinforced PVDF membrane with excellent antifouling property

“…Maximum pore size r max (nm) could be obtained by bubble point method, and calculated through Laplace's equation [25]:…”