Hydropedological insights when considering catchment classification

Abstract

Soil classification systems are analysed to explore the potential of developing classification systems for catchments. Soil classifications are useful to create systematic order in the overwhelming quantity of different soils in the world and to extrapolate data available for a given soil type to soils elsewhere with identical classifications. This principle also applies to catchments. However, to be useful, soil classifications have to be based on permanent characteristics as formed by the soil forming factors over often very long periods of time. When defining permanent catchment characteristics, discharge data would therefore appear to be less suitable. But permanent soil characteristics do not necessarily match with characteristics and parameters needed for functional soil characterization focusing, for example, on catchment hydrology. Hydropedology has made contributions towards the required functional characterization of soils as is illustrated for three recent hydrological catchment studies. However, much still needs to be learned about the physical behaviour of anisotropic, heterogeneous soils with varying soil structures during the year and about spatial and temporal variability. The suggestion is made therefore to first focus on improving simulation of catchment hydrology, possibly incorporating hydropedological expertise, before embarking on a catchment classification effort which involves major input of time and involves the risk of distraction. In doing so, we suggest to also define other characteristics for catchment performance than the traditionally measured discharge rates. Such characteristics may well be derived from societal issues being studied, as is illustrated for the Green Water Credits program

Hydrological drought across the world: impact of climate and physical catchment structure

“…Impact of soils on the similarity index (SI) (%) for the five Köppen-Geiger major climate types and three groundwater systems. or heavy clay soils) that were not included in this study may generate a more irregular discharge (e.g., Bouma et al, 2011) and, hence, might exhibit a more prominent role of soils on hydrological drought characteristics.…”

Hydropedology as a Powerful Tool for Environmental Policy and Regulations

“…This also offers an opportunity to define soil quality based on function 1. Bouma et al, 2011b). Bouma (2002) suggested the ratio between potential biomass production and waterlimited production as a quality measure for a given soil at a given location.…”

“…Bouma et al, 2011b). Soil maps show the spatial distribution of mapping units and their soil horizons and they can be used to provide data for regional hydrological models, which are currently often only calibrated on limited base-flow data (e.g.…”

Hydropedology and the Societal Challenge of Realizing the 2015 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals

“…But few, if any, studies have extended this work to define ranges for the results of agronomic, hydrological, or climate modeling. Bouma et al (2011) discussed the hydropedological aspects of modeling watersheds, defining Hydrological Response Units, and presenting three case studies where simulations were made with the 3D-SWAT model. These case studies again covered several SDGs.…”