1997
DOI: 10.1080/10601329708009384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrolysis and Subsequent Quaternization of Poly[(Isobutene-co-(m,p)-chloromethylstyrene)-g-2-methyl-2-oxazoline] and Poly((m,p)-Chloromethylstyrene-g-2-methyl-2-oxazoline)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature, few examples of copolymers composed of poly­(2-oxazoline) and PIB segments can be found. PIBs equipped with electrophilic end groups have been used as macroinitiators in the CROP of 2-oxazolines, especially 2-methyl-2-oxazoline (MeOx) or 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline (EtOx), to afford the corresponding PIB- b -poly­(2-oxazoline) diblock copolymers. This strategy has been expanded to telechelic and three-arm star PIB macroinitiators as well as isobutylene–chloromethylstyrene copolymers, which led to triblock, star, and graft copolymers, respectively. However, in case of initiator groups with insufficient reactivity, the macroinitiator approach bears the risk of producing rather broad molecular weight distributions. Alternative strategies are based on coupling preformed PIB and poly­(2-oxazoline) building blocks. , Surprisingly, micellar self-assembly of amphiphilic PIB–poly­(2-oxazoline) copolymers has not been studied in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, few examples of copolymers composed of poly­(2-oxazoline) and PIB segments can be found. PIBs equipped with electrophilic end groups have been used as macroinitiators in the CROP of 2-oxazolines, especially 2-methyl-2-oxazoline (MeOx) or 2-ethyl-2-oxazoline (EtOx), to afford the corresponding PIB- b -poly­(2-oxazoline) diblock copolymers. This strategy has been expanded to telechelic and three-arm star PIB macroinitiators as well as isobutylene–chloromethylstyrene copolymers, which led to triblock, star, and graft copolymers, respectively. However, in case of initiator groups with insufficient reactivity, the macroinitiator approach bears the risk of producing rather broad molecular weight distributions. Alternative strategies are based on coupling preformed PIB and poly­(2-oxazoline) building blocks. , Surprisingly, micellar self-assembly of amphiphilic PIB–poly­(2-oxazoline) copolymers has not been studied in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%