2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.12.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrolysers of modified mycotoxins in maize: α-Amylase and cellulase induce an underestimation of the total aflatoxin content

Abstract: Aflatoxins are the most potent genotoxic and carcinogenic mycotoxins. To date, research has only focused on the presence of free aflatoxins in agricultural commodities. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to investigate the occurrence of possible modified aflatoxins in maize. Different hydrolysis methods were applied to convert modified mycotoxins into their free aflatoxins. Eighteen aflatoxin-contaminated maize samples were incubated with potassium hydroxide, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid and seve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Masked fumonisins were determined through hydrolysis where modified forms were converted back to their free forms and subsequently analyzed and detected through LC/MS/MS (Dall’Asta et al, 2008; Dall’Asta et al, 2009). The hydrolytic process may involve either alkaline, acidic or enzymatic treatments (Dall’Asta et al, 2009; Beloglazova et al, 2013; Vidal et al, 2018). However, there is less information available on the masked AFs as most of the preference is given for the detection of free AFs in agricultural food and feed.…”
Section: Masked Mycotoxins As a Major Concern In Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masked fumonisins were determined through hydrolysis where modified forms were converted back to their free forms and subsequently analyzed and detected through LC/MS/MS (Dall’Asta et al, 2008; Dall’Asta et al, 2009). The hydrolytic process may involve either alkaline, acidic or enzymatic treatments (Dall’Asta et al, 2009; Beloglazova et al, 2013; Vidal et al, 2018). However, there is less information available on the masked AFs as most of the preference is given for the detection of free AFs in agricultural food and feed.…”
Section: Masked Mycotoxins As a Major Concern In Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby, pose a serious concern for human and animal health [193,[202][203][204][205][206][207]. Further, these transformations can be achieved by a hydrolytic process involving either alkaline, acidic or enzymatic methods [208,209]. Hence, these hydrolytic methods along with in vitro digestion followed by detection with chromatographic techniques like LC/MS/MS and confirmation by methods like ELISA can be applied for modified ZEN to ensure the safety of food and feed.…”
Section: Masked Mycotoxins As a Major Concern In Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such regulations typically reveal the strictest levels of AFTs for export and human consumption products while lowest levels are meant for items of industrial usage (Udomkun et al, 2017). Potential intervention approaches like coordination of supply chain, technical capacity building, provision of suitable incentives to control fungal infections and enhanced public awareness through extension services are vital to address the issue of aflatoxicosis (Deng et al, 2018;Fan et al, 2018;Klingelhöfer et al, 2018;Moon et al, 2018;Peng et al, 2018;Salem et al, 2018;Spanjer, 2019;Vidal et al, 2018;Xu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Regulation Of Afts In Food and Feed Itemsmentioning
confidence: 99%