2010
DOI: 10.1029/2009jg000977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological influences on spatiotemporal variations of δ15N and δ18O of nitrate in a forested headwater catchment in central Japan: Denitrification plays a critical role in groundwater

Abstract: − is that nitrification and denitrification occur concurrently in groundwater and that denitrification is more important than nitrification. The amount of denitrification in the groundwater body was controlled primarily by groundwater residence time. The combination of hydrological flow path from groundwater to stream water and denitrification in the groundwater critically control the amount of leaching of NO 3 − and temporal distribution of NO 3 − concentration in stream water. The possibility exists that den… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
53
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(81 reference statements)
6
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These δ 15 N values averaged 1.2 ± 0.4‰ in the surface organic horizons (Oi/Oe) and increased to 5.2 ± 1.1‰ in the Oa horizon and 6.0 ± 1.1‰ in Bh and Bhs horizons at 10-65 cm depth, similar to prior measurements in WS3 (48). Mineralization causes negligible 15 N fractionation (14,49) and so δ 15 N NH4 from mineralization of this soil organic N should also have this range of 15 N values (0.5-7.5‰). Isotopic fractionation during nitrification should be negligible when NH 4 + supply rate limits the rate of nitrification, but fractionation can occur when nitrification is slow or incomplete relative to the NH 4 + supply, producing δ 15 N NO3 values ∼2-20‰ lighter than those of the NH 4 + substrate (14,20,49).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These δ 15 N values averaged 1.2 ± 0.4‰ in the surface organic horizons (Oi/Oe) and increased to 5.2 ± 1.1‰ in the Oa horizon and 6.0 ± 1.1‰ in Bh and Bhs horizons at 10-65 cm depth, similar to prior measurements in WS3 (48). Mineralization causes negligible 15 N fractionation (14,49) and so δ 15 N NH4 from mineralization of this soil organic N should also have this range of 15 N values (0.5-7.5‰). Isotopic fractionation during nitrification should be negligible when NH 4 + supply rate limits the rate of nitrification, but fractionation can occur when nitrification is slow or incomplete relative to the NH 4 + supply, producing δ 15 N NO3 values ∼2-20‰ lighter than those of the NH 4 + substrate (14,20,49).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Hydrological disconnection between perched saturated zones and stream channels and denitrification rates may both broadly covary seasonally with the warm, drying conditions of summer (42), creating fragmented patches of saturation (40) at the time when denitrification in these zones may be particularly active (36). Although it is possible that this NO 3 − -depleted water is later exported to the stream (15), these data show concentrations of NO 3 − in groundwater equal to or higher than those of streamwater, suggesting that this was not the case at the time of sampling. If these episodes of fragmented denitrification have increased over time, for example, with the increases in summer temperature and precipitation that have been observed at this site (10,43), then denitrification may have significantly contributed both to the amount of "missing N" in the ecosystem N balance and to the observed changes in this balance over time.…”
Section: Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we used the concentration-weighted δ 15 N integrated to a depth of 1 m to estimate the δ 15 N of the initial NO 3 − available for denitrification (i.e., δ 15 N NO3−input ; SI Text). However, our data suggest that much of this NO 3 − was already consumed by denitrification (22) and biological uptake (Fig. 1C and Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%