2021
DOI: 10.1002/eco.2282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologic classification of Tanzanian rivers to support national water resource policy

Abstract: Classifying rivers into homogeneous categories based on hydrological and/or environmental attributes supports the implementation of environmental flows to sustain aquatic ecosystems and support the resource needs of society. Hydrological classifications provide decision‐makers with a pragmatic number of water management units by grouping individual rivers or river segments expected to exhibit similar biophysical responses to flow alteration. Such classifications are particularly useful across broad geographies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a stream classification system (SCS) to focus ecological relationships on specific segments of the hydrologic regime is an important step in developing ecological flows (Olden et al, 2012; Poff et al, 2010, 2017). Several studies have provided potential classification systems available for ready application based on hydrologic characteristics, typically determined from long‐term daily streamflow observations (Archfield et al, 2014; McManamay et al, 2012; Olden et al, 2021; Poff, 1996). However, expanding these metric‐based classification systems beyond the streamflow gages can be problematic (Eng et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of a stream classification system (SCS) to focus ecological relationships on specific segments of the hydrologic regime is an important step in developing ecological flows (Olden et al, 2012; Poff et al, 2010, 2017). Several studies have provided potential classification systems available for ready application based on hydrologic characteristics, typically determined from long‐term daily streamflow observations (Archfield et al, 2014; McManamay et al, 2012; Olden et al, 2021; Poff, 1996). However, expanding these metric‐based classification systems beyond the streamflow gages can be problematic (Eng et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We made initial assignments based on the following criteria, which follows the basic principles of several recent studies (McManamay & DeRolph, 2019; Olden et al, 2021). First, the network surrounding the calibrated gages is divided into groupings of HUC12s so that the mainstem and nearby tributaries are assigned the calibration parameters of the closest gage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can involve statistical classification of management units (e.g. Olden et al 2021) but, again, this approach requires substantial data input. Alternatively, generic typologies (e.g.…”
Section: Towards More Explicit Conservation In Holistic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, skewed spatial representation in the rain gauge network is a source of bias in precipitation estimates 9 , and similar landscape bias exists in the locations of US Geological Survey (USGS) stream gauges 10,11 . Similar placement bias in the global stream gauge network may limit our understanding of human water-supply systems, compromise efforts to achieve global biodiversity goals 12 , challenge the estimation of hydrologic impacts of human activities 13 and undermine best practices for determining environmental and cultural flow standards 14 . Yet our ability to assess the global representativeness of gauges has, until recently, been limited by a lack of global-scale stream gauge and environmental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%