2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogenation rate limiting step, diffusion and thermal conductivity in cold rolled magnesium hydride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By cold rolling, the particle size is reduced and defects are generated which contribute positively to the effectivity of microwave heating. Concerning the positive effect of cold rolling on hydrogen desorption, similar behavior has been observed for the conventional heating of cold rolled hydride powders [31,39,40]. This behavior has been attributed to the decrease in crystallite size and crystal defects generated during rolling which could act as fast diffusion paths and heterogeneous nucleating sites for diffusional phase transformations.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction: Microwave Irradiation Effectssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…By cold rolling, the particle size is reduced and defects are generated which contribute positively to the effectivity of microwave heating. Concerning the positive effect of cold rolling on hydrogen desorption, similar behavior has been observed for the conventional heating of cold rolled hydride powders [31,39,40]. This behavior has been attributed to the decrease in crystallite size and crystal defects generated during rolling which could act as fast diffusion paths and heterogeneous nucleating sites for diffusional phase transformations.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction: Microwave Irradiation Effectssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Good reviews describing kinetic models have already been published [43][44][45][47][48][49][50] . The classical model designation 45 , as well as a more identifiable designation, adopted before by Lang et al 51 , are given in Table 1.…”
Section: (De)hydrogenation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-fitted model indicates the most probable limiting step. A widespread and most straightforward procedure to find this out 51,52 is to arrange the model equations by leaving, on the left side, a function of the reacted fraction α, which ranges from 0 (at the beginning of reaction) to 1 (maximum attained sample capacity). The right side of all equations is kt: where k is the reaction constant and t is the reaction time.…”
Section: (De)hydrogenation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate limiting step can be determined from the best fit between the experimental data and the proposed models. This method of analysis is detailed in several reaction kinetic publications [11,47] and the mathematical models are given in Table 2. There are three single particle models that can describe kinetic reaction behaviour: surface reaction [48], Johnson-Mehl-A vrami (JMA) [3][4][5] and Carter-Valensi/Contracting Volume (CV) [8,49] models.…”
Section: Desorption Reaction Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Normalised data, a (dividing final amount desorbed experimentally after 24 h by the maximum possible hydrogen capacity, 5 wt.%). Table 3 Expanded set of reaction kinetic model equations [47].…”
Section: Desorption Reaction Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%