Ru adatoms were deposited on black Pt gauze by hydrogenating
Ru(COD)(η3-C3H5)2
(1, COD is
1,5-cyclooctadiene) over the gauze at low temperatures in hexanes
solution under 1 atm of dihydrogen gas.
A series of Pt−Ruad surfaces were prepared by
interrupting the hydrogenation after deposition of 0.05,
0.10,
0.30, 0.32, 0.44, 0.70, and 3.5 equiv of Ru adatoms. The ratio of
currents in the “double layer” to those in
the “hydride” region in the potentiodynamic responses of these
surfaces (0.5 M H2SO4, 25 °C, sweep
range
0.025−0.70 V, 5 mV/s) increased as the equivalents of Ru adatoms
increased. Stripping voltammetry of
adsorbed monolayers of carbon monoxide from these surfaces (0.5 M
H2SO4, 25 °C, sweep range
0.025−0.70 V, 5 mV/s) showed a drop by 120 mV in the CO stripping peak
potential upon deposition of 0.05 equiv
of Ru adatoms on Pt. Deposition of more Ru adatoms did not cause
significant further drops in the CO
stripping peak potential. The surfaces were evaluated as catalysts
for the electrooxidation of MeOH. The
measured currents were normalized to the specific surface areas of the
gauzes measured before deposition of
Ru adatoms by hydrogenation of 1. The order of activity
of MeOH-poisoned Pt−Ruad surfaces toward the
potentiodynamic oxidation of MeOH (0.5 M
H2SO4, 25 °C, sweep range 0.025−0.60
V, 5 mV/s) was 0.05
> 0.10 > 0.30 ∼ 0.44 > 0.7 > 0 (Pt) equiv of Ru adatoms. The
activity of Pt increased relative to the other
surfaces as the potential increased, becoming more active than 0.30,
0.70, and 0.44 equiv Pt−Ruad at the
upper limit of the sweeps. Surfaces with low equivalents of Ru
adatoms (from 0.05 to 0.10 equiv) were the
most active toward the potentiostatic oxidation of MeOH (E
= 0.4 V, 0.5 M H2SO4, 0.5 M MeOH, 25
°C)
with between 50 and 28 times higher turnover numbers than black Pt.
The activation energies for oxidation
of MeOH over 0.05 and 0.10 equiv of Pt−Ruad were 37 and
45 kJ/mol, respectively, at 0.4 V, 0.5 M
H2SO4,
and 0.5 M MeOH.