1983
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9517(83)90119-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogenation of olefins and polymerization of ethene over chromium oxide/silica catalysts IV. Kinetics of the polymerization reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Δ G i1 ‡ was as high as 21.1 kcal/mol for C­(OH)*, indicating its much lower propagation rate. The reaction enthalpy barriers between 4 TS­[6X-7X] and 4 6X were in the range of 12–14 kcal/mol, which was consistent with the values reported by Groeneveld et al and Blom et al, who, respectively reported activation energies of 12.7 and 17.9 kcal/mol for C 2 H 4 polymerization over CrO x /SiO 2 . , However, as shown in Figure , F modification causes the energies of 4 TS­[6X-7X] for C­(FOH)* and C­(F)* to be 4–5 kcal/mol lower than that for C­(OH)*, while those for A­(F)*, B­(FOH)*, and B­(F)* were slightly lower than or almost the same as those of the unmodified counterparts. Therefore, the Δ G i1 ‡ for C­(FOH)* and C­(F)* decreased to 17 and 16 kcal/mol, implying the major promotion effect of F modification on the propagation rate of the sites comprising 8CR .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand, Δ G i1 ‡ was as high as 21.1 kcal/mol for C­(OH)*, indicating its much lower propagation rate. The reaction enthalpy barriers between 4 TS­[6X-7X] and 4 6X were in the range of 12–14 kcal/mol, which was consistent with the values reported by Groeneveld et al and Blom et al, who, respectively reported activation energies of 12.7 and 17.9 kcal/mol for C 2 H 4 polymerization over CrO x /SiO 2 . , However, as shown in Figure , F modification causes the energies of 4 TS­[6X-7X] for C­(FOH)* and C­(F)* to be 4–5 kcal/mol lower than that for C­(OH)*, while those for A­(F)*, B­(FOH)*, and B­(F)* were slightly lower than or almost the same as those of the unmodified counterparts. Therefore, the Δ G i1 ‡ for C­(FOH)* and C­(F)* decreased to 17 and 16 kcal/mol, implying the major promotion effect of F modification on the propagation rate of the sites comprising 8CR .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Rate Law and Activity. First-order behavior with respect to monomer pressure has previously been observed for polymerizations by heterogeneous Cr/silica catalysts, ,, although reports of other orders ranging from zero , to second have also appeared; it has further been observed that the reaction order is pressure dependent . Polymerizations initiated by 2 at low pressures are cleanly pseudo-first-order in monomer for the entire course of the reaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It is known that chromium has the ability to selectively catalyze olefin trimerization, 25 as well as olefin oligomerization and polymerization. 26 The oil product showed good lubricating oil properties (Table 5) when compared with oil derived from oligomerization of 1-hexene by other catalysts. 3,12,[27][28][29] The high viscosity index of the product indicates that the oligomers from Cr/H-MCM-41 were mostly obtained from 1-hexene and that the 1-hexene was not isomerized prior to oligomerization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The oil fraction constituted about 60% of the product. It is known that chromium has the ability to selectively catalyze olefin trimerization, as well as olefin oligomerization and polymerization . The oil product showed good lubricating oil properties (Table ) when compared with oil derived from oligomerization of 1-hexene by other catalysts. ,, …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%