2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.137940
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen storage on chains-terminated fullerene C20 with density functional theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The structural parameters of the host clusters are provided in Table 2. The C‐C and C‐Si bond lengths of the optimized Si2normalC18 and Si4normalC16 are observed to be in agreement with the results demonstrated by Koohi et al 45 The binding energies of Si2normalC18Li6 and Si4normalC16Li6 calculated using the formula Eb=EitalicSinCmitalicLipnEitalicSimECpEitalicLim+n+p are observed to be −6.20 eV and −6.0 eV respectively, which is a little lower than that of normalC20 (−7.54 eV). Further, the binding energies of a single Li decorated over the energetically minimum sites (pentagonal rings containing one Si and four carbon atoms) of Si2normalC18 and Si4normalC16 cages are observed to be 1.99 eV and 3.16 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The structural parameters of the host clusters are provided in Table 2. The C‐C and C‐Si bond lengths of the optimized Si2normalC18 and Si4normalC16 are observed to be in agreement with the results demonstrated by Koohi et al 45 The binding energies of Si2normalC18Li6 and Si4normalC16Li6 calculated using the formula Eb=EitalicSinCmitalicLipnEitalicSimECpEitalicLim+n+p are observed to be −6.20 eV and −6.0 eV respectively, which is a little lower than that of normalC20 (−7.54 eV). Further, the binding energies of a single Li decorated over the energetically minimum sites (pentagonal rings containing one Si and four carbon atoms) of Si2normalC18 and Si4normalC16 cages are observed to be 1.99 eV and 3.16 eV, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…From the figure, it can be observed that the Li center of Si2normalC18Li6 and Si4normalC16Li6 cages can adsorb a maximum of 5H 2 molecules, making the final saturated hydrogen adsorbed complex as Si 2 C 18 Li 6 ‐30H 2 and Si 4 C 16 Li 6 ‐30H 2 . From the sequential adsorption study, the maximum gravimetric densities calculated using Equation () for Si2normalC18Li6 and Si4normalC16Li6 complexes are obtained as 16.15% and 14.87%, respectively, which are relatively higher than the results reported by Sahoo et al for Li decorated normalC20 fullerene 39 and Huang et al for chain‐terminated normalC20 fullerene 45 . The average adsorption energies of Si 2 C 18 Li 6 ‐30H 2 and Si 4 C 16 Li 6 ‐30H 2 cages are found to be 0.130 eV and 0.131 eV/H 2 , respectively, which are relatively lower than the adsorption energies reported by Huang et al for chain‐terminated normalC20 fullerene, 45 Ammar et al for Ti decorated normalC20 fullerene 34 and almost comparable to that for Li decorated normalC20 fullerene as studied by Sahoo et al 39 It signifies that the adsorption is in the quasi‐molecular and the fact is also established during their geometrical analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20] In another work, carbon atomic chains and Ti terminated C 20 were theoretically designed and it has been demonstrated that T-terminated C 20 are considered as the good candidates for hydrogen storage. [21] Another interesting fullerene molecule is C 28 which is the smallest and stable chiral fullerene and exhibits a high reactivity. [22] C 28 could be formed by the fusion of fullerenes with compatible symmetry such as C 10 and C 18 [23] and has a potential for various applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used in a variety of disciplines, including electronics, sensing, catalysis, gas storage and the environment. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The high surface-to-volume ratio, superior mechanical and thermal stability, and, most importantly, the ease of functionalization have made these materials an attractive candidate for drug delivery by encapsulating or attaching drugs to their exterior surfaces. 6,[25][26][27] Furthermore, the small size of these systems allows them to move more easily throughout the human body than larger materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%