2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrogen distribution network optimization: a refinery case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The design problem is formulated as a linear programming problem using linear cost correlations. This approach, based on the concept of hydrogen surplus and linear programming, has been successfully applied to address the problem of hydrogen distribution at the Porto Refinery of the GALP ENERGIA network by Fonseca et al (2008).…”
Section: Hydrogen Pinch Analysis and Design Of Hydrogen Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design problem is formulated as a linear programming problem using linear cost correlations. This approach, based on the concept of hydrogen surplus and linear programming, has been successfully applied to address the problem of hydrogen distribution at the Porto Refinery of the GALP ENERGIA network by Fonseca et al (2008).…”
Section: Hydrogen Pinch Analysis and Design Of Hydrogen Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hallale and Liu [8] proposed a mathematical approach for determining the minimum utility consumption and the maximum recovery of the hydrogen network. Fonseca et al [9] employed the linear programming model to optimize a hydrogen network refinery, leading to a 30 % reduction in hydrogen utility usage. Khajehpour et al [2] proposed objective functions that minimize waste flows containing hydrogen and reduce hydrogen production.…”
Section: Background and Previous Work On Hydrogen Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the GCA technique does not allow the user to represent multiple source and demand streams having the same purity as separate streams with individual flow rates but lumps it together. This prevents the user from understanding the effects of changing the flow rate of an individual stream, making it difficult to do a sensitivity analysis [22]. Secondly, it is important to label each stream with a name, which the GCA technique does not do.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it is important to label each stream with a name, which the GCA technique does not do. Third, to identify the pinch, the GCA technique still requires an initial assumption of a fresh hydrogen flow rate and goes through two iterations [14][15][16]22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%