2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic response and power efficiency analysis of heaving wave energy converter integrated with breakwater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zheng & Zhang [20] studied the performance of a hybrid WEC consisting of a fixed inverted flume and a long floating cube hinged with the flume, and an analytical study on power capture capability of the device for various geometrical parameters showed that the maximum power efficiency reached 95%. Reabroy et al [21] investigated the hydrodynamic and power capture performance of an asymmetric WEC integrated with a fixed breakwater using Star-CCM+ software and experiment, and showed the maximum power efficiency of the WEC was 0.376. Previous studies have focused on the hydrodynamic performance of hybrid systems with symmetric WECs, and have neglected wave resonance in the gap between the WEC and breakwater, which is one of the important differences between the dual-floater hybrid system and the single integrated system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng & Zhang [20] studied the performance of a hybrid WEC consisting of a fixed inverted flume and a long floating cube hinged with the flume, and an analytical study on power capture capability of the device for various geometrical parameters showed that the maximum power efficiency reached 95%. Reabroy et al [21] investigated the hydrodynamic and power capture performance of an asymmetric WEC integrated with a fixed breakwater using Star-CCM+ software and experiment, and showed the maximum power efficiency of the WEC was 0.376. Previous studies have focused on the hydrodynamic performance of hybrid systems with symmetric WECs, and have neglected wave resonance in the gap between the WEC and breakwater, which is one of the important differences between the dual-floater hybrid system and the single integrated system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of device hydrodynamics was demonstrated by Chen et al [26], who found that floaters with conical bottoms greatly improved WEC energy efficiency due to the smaller viscous damping compared with the square bottom. Reabroy et al [27] numerically and experimentally investigated the hydrodynamic and power performance of an asymmetric WEC integrated with a fixed breakwater, and showed that the maximum power efficiency of the WEC model was 37.6%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They require expensive mesh generation and present severe technical challenges to capturing the free surface as well as the nonlinearities within rapidly changing geometries. Some research works where the finite volume method is applied to the analysis of a single-body point-absorber are [22][23][24][25]. When simulating a multi-body device, an ad-hoc approach to model the kinematics is often employed [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%