2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic radius determination with asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation using decaying cross-flows. Part II. Experimental evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a constant V c in the elution step one can evaluate the hydrodynamic diameter of a colloid, d H , from the retention ratio, R, dened as a ratio of the retention time (t r ) to the void time (t 0 ), which is the elution time of a nonretained component such as sodium azide. 26,31 In this study we adapted the gradient cross ow method, 27,28 where V c is decreased over time in order to extend the fractionation range in a given experimental time without a large loss of resolution for relatively smaller sizes. V c was quadratically decreased as a function of time, t, in the form V c ¼ 0.9(t À 30) 2 /900 for the granitic groundwater, and V c ¼ 1.…”
Section: Fl-fff-icp-ms Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a constant V c in the elution step one can evaluate the hydrodynamic diameter of a colloid, d H , from the retention ratio, R, dened as a ratio of the retention time (t r ) to the void time (t 0 ), which is the elution time of a nonretained component such as sodium azide. 26,31 In this study we adapted the gradient cross ow method, 27,28 where V c is decreased over time in order to extend the fractionation range in a given experimental time without a large loss of resolution for relatively smaller sizes. V c was quadratically decreased as a function of time, t, in the form V c ¼ 0.9(t À 30) 2 /900 for the granitic groundwater, and V c ¼ 1.…”
Section: Fl-fff-icp-ms Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study colloids in a limited range of size of the granitic groundwater were examined. 19 We have extended it by using the gradient cross ow technique 27,28 and measuring even larger colloids appearing in the washing step to determine the similarities and differences in the size distribution and compositions of colloids in both the groundwater samples over a wide size range. The comparison of these groundwater samples is of great importance, as their geological settings are potential candidates of repository sites in geological disposal programs of many countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of the diffusion coefficient from the elution time becomes more complex if the cross-flow changes during elution. A numerical solution was therefore developed for trapezoidal channel and was improved for cross-flow decaying with the time [170][171][172].…”
Section: Separation Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radius of gyration ( r g ) of the dimer and the hexamer of the Lb GadB could not be measured by MALS as the analytes behaved as isotropic scatterers, and hence, no angular dependence in the scattered light is observed. The d H was determined using AF4 theory [ 23 , 24 ] and were compared with results obtained from molecular modeling for the dimer and the hexamer of Lb GadB. From the AF4 theory, the d H of the dimer and the hexamer of Lb GadB were determined to be 6 and 10 nm, respectively, and were in reasonable agreement with those from molecular modeling, which were 6.4 × 7.6 nm for the dimer and 7.6 × 13.1 nm for the hexamer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, the Berry method was used to fit the light scattering data [ 21 , 22 ]. From AF4 retention time, the hydrodynamic diameter ( d H ) of a sample was calculated by the AF4 theory using the FFFHydRad 2.0 software [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%