The Publications of the MultiScience - XXXII. MicroCAD International Scientific Conference 2018
DOI: 10.26649/musci.2018.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrodynamic factors in an anaerobic digester

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various impeller geometries and digester designs have been studied [5,12]. For instance, Lebranchu et al [13] demonstrated that mixing with helical ribbon (HR) impeller produced 50% more biogas relative to a single RT impeller due to better distribution of shear and viscosity in the entire 2-L digester during laminar flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various impeller geometries and digester designs have been studied [5,12]. For instance, Lebranchu et al [13] demonstrated that mixing with helical ribbon (HR) impeller produced 50% more biogas relative to a single RT impeller due to better distribution of shear and viscosity in the entire 2-L digester during laminar flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31]. The evaluation of mechanical mixing requires the geometrical constraints of both the impeller and digester to predict the shear stresses and flow patterns and their effect on the microbiology and biogas production [32]. On the other hand, most of the studies to evaluate mixing are just focused on lab-scale experiments whereas the mixing process should be scaled up to the large-scale biogas plants to achieve higher efficiency in a biogas plants in terms of internal energy consumption and biogas production rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%