1980
DOI: 10.3133/pp751f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydraulic effects of recharging the Magothy Aquifer, Bay Park, New York, with tertiary-treated sewage

Abstract: From 1968 to 1973, water from public supply and water reclaimed from sewage were used in a series of 19 artificialrecharge experiments at Bay Park, N.Y. Recharge to the Magothy aquife-r was through a fiberglass-cased well with a 16-inch-diameter stainless-~steel screen set from 418 to 480

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chlorine concentration for the low pH SPIE was chosen much lower than the one for neutral pH SPIE: being fed for less time before disinfection, its chlorine demand was likely lower. While relatively high, these chlorine concentrations are significantly lower than concentrations used by Ehrlich et al (20) and Vecchioli et al (21) for groundwater recharge studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chlorine concentration for the low pH SPIE was chosen much lower than the one for neutral pH SPIE: being fed for less time before disinfection, its chlorine demand was likely lower. While relatively high, these chlorine concentrations are significantly lower than concentrations used by Ehrlich et al (20) and Vecchioli et al (21) for groundwater recharge studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Several investigators have addressed the effects of disinfection on biological clogging in aquifers. With studies on groundwater recharge, Ehrlich et al (20) and Vecchioli et al (21) showed that maintaining a residual chlorine concentration greater than 2-2.5 mg/L reduced clogging in general and in some instances prevented clogging by microorganisms. McCarty et al (3) used hydrogen peroxide to control biological clogging near the injection well during in-situ bioremediation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors contributing to biological clogging of filtration beds, recharge basins, and aquifers during in-situ bioremediation are yet poorly understood. Investigators have studied biological clogging effects from change in flow rate under constant head conditions ( ) and biomass build-up ( ). Clogging is reported to result from liquid porosity reduction due to biofilm growth ( , ), from the formation of biomass aggregates plugging pore necks ( , ), from the production of extra-cellular polymers that fill the pores (), from the formation of gas bubbles that prevent liquid flow (), and from an increase in pore channel friction factor ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%