2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-006-0079-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid multi-objective shape design optimization using Taguchi’s method and genetic algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A research based on a new hybrid approach, which deals with the improvement of shape optimization process, is given in [53]. An integrated and optimized product design framework to support the design optimization applications in concurrent engineering is given to show the effectiveness of hybrid approaches and how they can be used to improve the performance of integrated design optimization applications in [54].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research based on a new hybrid approach, which deals with the improvement of shape optimization process, is given in [53]. An integrated and optimized product design framework to support the design optimization applications in concurrent engineering is given to show the effectiveness of hybrid approaches and how they can be used to improve the performance of integrated design optimization applications in [54].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ray and Liew [22] used a swarm metaphor approach in which a new optimization algorithm based on behavioural concepts similar to real swarm was proposed to solve the same problem. Yıldız et al [23] used hybrid robust genetic algorithm combining Taguchi's method and genetic algorithm. The combination of genetic algorithm with robust parameter design through a smaller population of individuals resulted in a solution that lead to better parameter values for design optimization problems.…”
Section: Previous Work On Disc Brakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid confusion with common wireless communications terminology, this article will refer to this as SNR Tag . There are three distinct formulas for calculation of SNR Tag : (1) lower-is-better (LIB) as shown in 1; (2) higher-is-better (HIB) as shown in 2; and (3) nominal-is-better (NIB) as shown in 3 [20]. Each sample of the metric under consideration is denoted as y i and y is the overall sample mean given from n replicates.…”
Section: Taguchi Signal-to-noise Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%