Hybrid domain representation archive (HyDRA) for requirements model synthesis across viewpoints (poster session)

Barber, K. Suzanne; Jernigan, S.R.

doi:10.1145/337180.337636

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The framework is not applied in any domain and this conceptual framework 'may not be conclusive as it needs to be confirmed and refined further' [35]. Some research studies discuss stakeholders as an essential part of the research like [36][37][38][39][40][41] but these studies do not focus on the SIQ process directly.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stakeholder management in value‐based software development: systematic review

Babar¹,

Ghazali²,

Jawawi³

et al. 2014

IET softw.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the value-based software (VBS) development, an innovative idea is realised in order to gain an economic leverage. The VBS systems deal with financial streams and this thing make them different from the conventional systems. The success of a VBS system is associated with a valuable set of requirements. The valuable requirements can only be gathered from success critical stakeholders. To select a set of success critical stakeholders, different stakeholders identification and quantification (SIQ) approaches are presented by the researchers. The current approaches cannot be adopted as a standard as different methods and processes are adopted in different approaches. In this study, the aim is to find out the reported evidence based attributes or characteristics of the stakeholders and their usage context in terms of their application in different domains, stakeholders' quantification metrics, the reported stakeholder types and the reported issues of VBS development. The standard systematic literature review guidelines are used as given by Barbara Kitchenham. The literature evidence shows that there is a need to explore all the possible stakeholders' attributes. The stakeholders' metrics can be derived by using the stakeholders' attributes and a new SIQ framework can be proposed for the VBS systems.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stakeholder management in value‐based software development: systematic review

Babar¹,

Ghazali²,

Jawawi³

et al. 2014

IET softw.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Comparative Systematic Analysis of Stakeholder’s Identification Methods in Requirements Elicitation

Khan

Assam

et al. 2022

IEEE Access

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context and Motivation]Before eliciting and gathering requirements for a software project, it is considered pivotal to know about concerned stakeholders. It becomes hard to elicit the actual system requirements without identifying relevant stakeholders, leading the software project to failure. Despite the paramount importance of stakeholder identification in requirement elicitation, it has been given less attention in the software engineering literature.[Method] For this purpose, we conducted a thorough Systematic Literature Review (SLR) on stakeholder identification (SI) and its methods in requirement elicitation. However, previously, a literature study on SI in the requirement elicitation was conducted. We found that no one has proposed any standard or baseline research method for stakeholder identification, stakeholder assessment, and stakeholder interaction up to date according to our knowledge. It provides an opportunity to update the current SLR on SI in requirements elicitation from 2011 till 2021 to search for a baseline methodology for the SI. For this purpose, we explored the existing literature research that involves the SI methods in requirements elicitation. [Principle Ideas/Results] Furthermore, we identify and capture seventeen research methodologies for SI, eight key stakeholders interaction methods, and ten stakeholders assessment methods in requirement elicitation. To further enhance the stakeholder identification process, we additionally identify pivotal information such as different potential stakeholder categories, stakeholder assessments methods, and stakeholder interaction methods. Also, based on the proposed SLR, we find out the existing gaps and new opportunities for SI methods in the requirement elicitation. [Contribution] These SI methodologies help requirements engineers and practitioners identify key stakeholders and efficiently improve the requirements quality. Moreover, this research study helps identify the effective practices used for the traditional and CrowdRE SI, recover consequences that can affect the effectiveness of SI, and recommend advisable SI practices to be employed in the future. This research study would help the software researchers and developers efficiently and accurately identify correct and concerned stakeholders to improve end-user satisfaction instead of considering it a self-evident task. INDEX TERMS Stakeholder Identification, stakeholder methods, Requirement Elicitation, SLR.

show abstract

Hybrid domain representation archive (HyDRA) for requirements model synthesis across viewpoints (poster session)

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Stakeholder management in value‐based software development: systematic review

Stakeholder management in value‐based software development: systematic review

A Comparative Systematic Analysis of Stakeholder’s Identification Methods in Requirements Elicitation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About