SAE Technical Paper Series 2000
DOI: 10.4271/2000-01-2955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Diesel-Electric Heavy Duty Bus Emissions: Benefits Of Regeneration And Need For State Of Charge Correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fuel consumption and air pollutant emissions from five diesel hybrid electric buses and diesel buses were measured on the chassis dynamometer by WVU (Clark et al, 2000). The results showed about 13% fuel economy gain and significant air pollutant emission reductions for MY 1998 hybrid buses on the CBD cycle, compared to their diesel counterparts.…”
Section: Hybrid Electric Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuel consumption and air pollutant emissions from five diesel hybrid electric buses and diesel buses were measured on the chassis dynamometer by WVU (Clark et al, 2000). The results showed about 13% fuel economy gain and significant air pollutant emission reductions for MY 1998 hybrid buses on the CBD cycle, compared to their diesel counterparts.…”
Section: Hybrid Electric Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fuel economy comparison, SOC correction is very necessary. Therefore the SOC correction method in the SAE standards [33] is applied to compensate for the SOC difference. Compared with the rule-based control strategy, the fuel consumptions of energy management strategies based on multiple driving cycle optimization and driving pattern recognition are improved by 4.36% and 11.68%, respectively.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, discrepancies between predicted and measured NO X may be attributed in part to off-cycle emissions. The effect of off-cycle emissions on comparison of predicted and actual NO X emissions were described previously in detail by Conley et al 6 The effects of control strategy variation have also been evaluated and discussed in detail by Clark et al, 30,31 Azu, 32 and Messer et al 33 From Figures 11 and 13, the model suggests that the bus engine had a steady idle during vehicle decelerations and low axle power demand, whereas actual fueling appeared to be reduced during decelerations and was evidently more load following than what the model anticipated at light loads. Table 6 shows the summary of the integrated predicted and actual emissions results on the three cycles tested by the vehicle.…”
Section: Modeling Of a Hybrid Electric Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy storage system state of charge difference must be considered for accurate emissions predictions, 3 as well as the hybrid vehicle energy management strategy. 4 Both factors can affect the distance-specific emissions significantly. The onboard energy storage system in a hybrid electric vehicle destroys the relationship between instantaneous vehicle power demand and instantaneous emissions, because the engine is decoupled from the drive wheels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%