2016
DOI: 10.5370/jeet.2016.11.5.1457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Control Method of Magnetically Controlled Shape Memory Alloy Actuator Based on Inverse Prandtl-Ishlinskii Model

Abstract: -The hysteresis nonlinearity of magnetically controlled shape memory alloy actuator is an obstacle in the achievement of high positioning accuracy. To eliminate the influence of hysteresis nonlinearity, a PID hybrid control method which uses the inverse Prandtl-Ishlinskii model as a feedforward controller is proposed in this paper. The PID parameters are searched by particle swarm optimization with cross and heredity function. The simulation results show that when the influence of external disturbance is not c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feedforward control approach is most widely used for compensating the hysteresis nonlinearity, structuring a controller by placing in a feedforward loop as a compensator with various models. These models include the Preisach model [ 15 ], the Prandtl–Ishlinskii model [ 16 , 17 , 18 ], the Krasnoselskii–Pokrovskii model [ 19 ], the Bouc–Wen model [ 20 , 21 ], the Duhem model [ 22 , 23 ], the Dahl model [ 24 ], and the neural network model [ 25 , 26 ] to suppress the undesirable behaviors. It is pointed out that the precision of open-loop control is affected by modeling errors concerning these hysteresis models; furthermore, open-loop control cannot suppress the influence of external interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedforward control approach is most widely used for compensating the hysteresis nonlinearity, structuring a controller by placing in a feedforward loop as a compensator with various models. These models include the Preisach model [ 15 ], the Prandtl–Ishlinskii model [ 16 , 17 , 18 ], the Krasnoselskii–Pokrovskii model [ 19 ], the Bouc–Wen model [ 20 , 21 ], the Duhem model [ 22 , 23 ], the Dahl model [ 24 ], and the neural network model [ 25 , 26 ] to suppress the undesirable behaviors. It is pointed out that the precision of open-loop control is affected by modeling errors concerning these hysteresis models; furthermore, open-loop control cannot suppress the influence of external interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models typically have a rate-independent hysteretic nature, which is their output variable does not depend on the first derivative of the input one [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. Such as Duhem model [ 10 ], Bouc–Wen model [ 11 , 12 ], Prandtl–Ishlinskii (PI) model [ 13 , 14 ], Preisach model [ 15 ], and Krasnoselskii–Pokrovskii (KP) model [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. The Duhem model and Bouc–Wen model are differential equation-based hysteresis models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%