2013
DOI: 10.1080/02726343.2013.777319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Boundary Element Method and Quasi-TEM Analysis of Two-Dimensional Transmission Lines—Generalization

Abstract: The hybrid boundary element method, based on the equivalent electrodes method and the boundary element method, is presented in this article. This method is applied on several examples for calculating the characteristic impedance of transmission lines. It should be emphasized that the combination of the equivalent electrodes method and a new variant of the boundary element method can be efficiently implemented in quasi-transverse electromagnetic analysis of transmission lines without loss of accuracy. All resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A generalization of the HBEM, which is applied in this paper for microstrip lines analysis, was described in detail in [15] and [16]. This method presents a combination of the BEM/MoM, the equivalent electrodes method (EEM) [24] and the point-matching method (PMM).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A generalization of the HBEM, which is applied in this paper for microstrip lines analysis, was described in detail in [15] and [16]. This method presents a combination of the BEM/MoM, the equivalent electrodes method (EEM) [24] and the point-matching method (PMM).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The segments at any boundary surfaces between the two layers are replaced by discrete equivalent total charges. Those charges are placed in the air [15,16]. The equivalent electrodes are line charges whose radius is determined in [24].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations