2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9112258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting Critical Buckling Load of Structural Members under Compression Considering the Influence of Initial Geometric Imperfections

Abstract: The main aim of this study is to develop different hybrid artificial intelligence (AI) approaches, such as an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and two ANFISs optimized by metaheuristic techniques, namely simulated annealing (SA) and biogeography-based optimization (BBO) for predicting the critical buckling load of structural members under compression, taking into account the influence of initial geometric imperfections. With this aim, the existing results of compression tests on steel columns were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Validation performance is a critical step in a modeling procedure, for which several statistical indices has been suggested and used [13,14,[49][50][51][52]. In this study, we used Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) [39,[53][54][55][56], Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], Kappa, Accuracy (ACC), Specificity (SPF), Sensitivity (SST), Negative predictive value (NPV), and Positive predictive value (PPV) [65][66][67][68][69]. Detail description of these indices is presented in published literature [61,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation performance is a critical step in a modeling procedure, for which several statistical indices has been suggested and used [13,14,[49][50][51][52]. In this study, we used Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) [39,[53][54][55][56], Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], Kappa, Accuracy (ACC), Specificity (SPF), Sensitivity (SST), Negative predictive value (NPV), and Positive predictive value (PPV) [65][66][67][68][69]. Detail description of these indices is presented in published literature [61,[70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77].…”
Section: Validation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset was randomly divided into two sub-datasets including the training part (60%) and testing part (40%) part. All data were scaled into the range of [0,1] in order to reduce numerical biases while treating with the AI algorithms, as recommended by various studies in the literature [102][103][104]. Such a scaling process is expressed using Equation (4) between raw and scaled data [105][106][107]:…”
Section: Data Used and Selection Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noticing that such a rate of testing/training was recommended in the literature when developing ML-based models [13][14][15][16][17]. On the other hand, in order to reduce fluctuations within the dataset in training the ML model, as the variables have different ranges of values, all variables were scaled into the range of [0, 1] in order to avoid an unexpected jump in optimizing weight parameters of the models [13,[18][19][20]. The scaling process of a variable x is expressed by Equation (1), and it involves two parameters, α and β, as indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Data Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%