1994
DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.3920050108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humor in human resource development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is indirect support for the application of emotional contagion theory to the selection context. Studies have shown that positive affect and humor decrease the level of anxiety experienced (Boverie, Hoffman, Klein, McClelland, & Oldknow, 1994;Gelkopf & Kreitler, 1996;Morreall, 1991;Newman & Stone, 1996). Unknown is whether these findings generalize to the selection context.…”
Section: Applicant Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is indirect support for the application of emotional contagion theory to the selection context. Studies have shown that positive affect and humor decrease the level of anxiety experienced (Boverie, Hoffman, Klein, McClelland, & Oldknow, 1994;Gelkopf & Kreitler, 1996;Morreall, 1991;Newman & Stone, 1996). Unknown is whether these findings generalize to the selection context.…”
Section: Applicant Anxietymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentro dessa perspectiva, o uso do humor em empresas tem sido associado ao aumento da moral entre os trabalhadores (Grunner, 1997), à criação de uma cultura organizacional mais positiva (Clouse e Spurgeon, 1995), à melhoria da coesão de grupos (Duncan, 1982), à redução de conflitos nas empresas (Duncan et al, 1990;Abramis, 1992;Rothwell, 1996;Smith et al, 2000), à facilitação da expressão de emoções negativas (Martineau, 1972;Pollio, 1995), à canalização da hostilidade (Wilson, 1979), à manutenção da ordem social (Dwyer, 1991), ao estímulo da criatividade individual e grupal (Csikszentmihaly, 1996;Murdock e Ganim,1993), ao aumento da motivação (Crawford, 1994;Dienstbier, 1995;Lippitt, 1982), ao incremento da produtividade (Clouse e Spurgeon, 1995;Duncan e Feisal, 1989;Avolio et al, 1999), ao aumento da eficácia de processos de mudanças nas empresas (Bovey, 2001;Kahn, 1989), ao estímulo de novas perspectivas (Dixon, 1980), ao estímulo ao comprometimento no grupo (Duncan, 1982;Martin e Lefcourt, 1983;Ziv e Gadish, 1990), e ao estímulo do aprendizado e do desenvolvimento (Boverie et al, 1994).…”
Section: Thomaz Wood Jr and Miguel P Caldasunclassified
“…Even where humour has been considered, this is often from the point of view of instructors (Boverie et al, 1994;Kaupins, 1991;Zemke, 1991). Emphasis on instructors' potential or actual uses of humour tends, however, to downplay the collaborative character of learning events.…”
Section: Humour In Corporate Training Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as instructors may deploy humour in order to realize the goals they bring to learning events, so too may learners. Although learners' humour is unlikely to be 'planned' whereas instructors' may well be (Boverie et al, 1994), humour may none the less be one key resource learners use to enable them to manage the problems they encounter during their learning experiences.…”
Section: Humour In Corporate Training Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%