2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humic acids as electron acceptors in wetland decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
84
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for such imbalance are unclear at the moment, but one possible answer is the use of organic oxidants for the degradation of organic matter, e.g. certain humic compounds that are reduced while others are concomitantly oxidized to CO 2 (Heitmann et al, 2007;Keller et al, 2009). Based on our observations, we hypothesize that organic oxidants are more important in the more oligotrophic than the mesotrophic peatlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The reasons for such imbalance are unclear at the moment, but one possible answer is the use of organic oxidants for the degradation of organic matter, e.g. certain humic compounds that are reduced while others are concomitantly oxidized to CO 2 (Heitmann et al, 2007;Keller et al, 2009). Based on our observations, we hypothesize that organic oxidants are more important in the more oligotrophic than the mesotrophic peatlands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Furthermore, it was not known how the prevalence of Fe(III) reduction impacts CH 4 production in this ecosystem. The high ratios of CO 2 :CH 4 dissolved in soil pore water and produced in anaerobic laboratory incubations indicate an ecosystem with an abundance of alternative e − acceptors for anaerobic respiration (Updegraff et al, 1995;van Hulzen et al, 1999;Keller and Bridgham, 2007;Keller et al, 2009). In the absence of alternative e − acceptors, roughly equimolar concentrations of CO 2 and CH 4 would be produced (i.e., a ratio of one), whereas values observed in incubations and dissolved in soil pore water were generally orders of magnitude higher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that adding the Fe(III) amendment as an amorphous solid created a coating over surface-attached microorganisms that slowed microbial activity for a period of time. Another possibility is that reduced respiration was caused by the 1-unit decrease in pH in Fe(III)-amended slurries (data not shown; Keller et al (2009)). A third possibility is that Fe(III) directly inhibited methanogenesis through a mechanism that does not shunt electrons to a CO 2 -yielding respiration process, as shown to occur in pure methanogenic cultures (van Bodegom et al, 2004).…”
Section: Role Of Electron Acceptorsmentioning
confidence: 96%