2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2011.2169980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Walking-Intention-Based Motion Control of an Omnidirectional-Type Cane Robot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this better performance is that the force sensors used in the proposed method are more stable and have less noise and drift phenomena. Besides, although identification errors were found in each direction, the results were promising and showed greater levels of accuracy than those reported elsewhere [32,35]. Since the proposed fuzzy knowledge base drawn from linguistic variables can appropriately simulate the relation between forearm pressure and directional intent, it is more accurate than the method proposed in [32,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for this better performance is that the force sensors used in the proposed method are more stable and have less noise and drift phenomena. Besides, although identification errors were found in each direction, the results were promising and showed greater levels of accuracy than those reported elsewhere [32,35]. Since the proposed fuzzy knowledge base drawn from linguistic variables can appropriately simulate the relation between forearm pressure and directional intent, it is more accurate than the method proposed in [32,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Besides, although identification errors were found in each direction, the results were promising and showed greater levels of accuracy than those reported elsewhere [32,35]. Since the proposed fuzzy knowledge base drawn from linguistic variables can appropriately simulate the relation between forearm pressure and directional intent, it is more accurate than the method proposed in [32,35]. The cause of identification errors might be related to the exact of knowledge base and reasonability of the distance-calculation method and reasoning method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another means of detecting external forces is physical force/torque sensors such as strain gauges or optoelectronics. This approach has been used in many mobile platform applications such as anticipating user intention with a force-based joystick [21], developing a handle with force/torque sensing capabilities [24], implementing an impedance control law based on force/ torque sensed on a handle [2], and quantifying user intent and responding with an admittance controller based on a force/torque sensor mounted on a stick [11,27]. However, all of these methods rely on detecting forces and torques at a specific location, such as on a handle, or joystick.…”
Section: Mobile Platforms With Contact Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27), with B r given by the model of Eq. (28) we searched over B r and α until the simulation matched the real data.…”
Section: Empirical Estimation Of Roller Dampingmentioning
confidence: 99%