2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-228624/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human transcription factor protein interaction networks

Abstract: In participation of transcriptional regulation, transcription factors (TFs) interact with several other proteins. Here, we identified 7233 and 2176 protein-protein interactions for 110 different human TFs through proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID) and affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS), respectively. The BioID analysis resulted more high-confident interactions, highlighting the transient and dynamic nature of many of the TF interactions. Using clustering and correlation analyses, we identi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate TF-COF interactions in a single cell type, we first examined data from cell-specific PPI predictions 45 and proximity-labeling approaches. 46 We find comparable numbers of TF interactions per COF between CoRec (average of 6.3 clusters per COF) and these published approaches (average of 3 and 9 clusters per COF for cell-specific PPI predictions 45 and BioID 46 respectively). To understand how our approach compared to larger datasets, we examined the number of TF-COF interactions reported for each COF in public PPI databases (STRING (v12.0, physical subnetwork) 47 , HIPPIE (v2.3) 48 , BioGrid (release 4.4.221) 49 , APID(version: March 2021) 50 ) (Figure 2D).…”
Section: Corec Identifies Cell-specific Tf-cof Interaction Networksupporting
confidence: 54%
“…To evaluate TF-COF interactions in a single cell type, we first examined data from cell-specific PPI predictions 45 and proximity-labeling approaches. 46 We find comparable numbers of TF interactions per COF between CoRec (average of 6.3 clusters per COF) and these published approaches (average of 3 and 9 clusters per COF for cell-specific PPI predictions 45 and BioID 46 respectively). To understand how our approach compared to larger datasets, we examined the number of TF-COF interactions reported for each COF in public PPI databases (STRING (v12.0, physical subnetwork) 47 , HIPPIE (v2.3) 48 , BioGrid (release 4.4.221) 49 , APID(version: March 2021) 50 ) (Figure 2D).…”
Section: Corec Identifies Cell-specific Tf-cof Interaction Networksupporting
confidence: 54%
“…To realistically simulate the regulatory relationships of the human molecular network, we collected 11 high-quality molecular interaction databases, including HuRI [9] , BioPlex [25] , BioGRID [26] , DIP [27] , MINT [28] , InnateDB [29] , PhosphoSitePlus [30] , INSIDER [31] , KnockTF [7] , IntAct [32] , and TRRUST [33] . The molecular interactions in these databases were derived from experiments or expert-validated relationships.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This point has been addressed in a recent study, where Göös and colleagues performed both PBL and AP‐MS for 109 human TFs. Their results showed a minor overlap of interactors identified by both strategies, thereby suggesting the orthogonality between proximity biotinylation and enrichment approaches, where the former identifies more transient PPIs [70].…”
Section: Affinity Purification Strategies For Defined Interactome Stu...mentioning
confidence: 99%