Human Systems Integration Design: Which Generalized Rationale?

Abstract

Abstract. In this paper, we present a synthesis of our fundamental and theoretical research on human system integration and human in-the-loop system for enhancing human performance -especially for technical gestures, in safety critical systems operations such as surgery, astronauts' extra-vehicular activities and aeronautics. Grounding humans-systems integration engineering and design (modelling and simulation) on a formally and experimentally verified theoretical framework, is a necessity to make sure of human in-the-loop system security, safety and reliability. The rise issues concerned with scientific principles of human systems integration and rationale for human in-the-loop systems technical engineering and managerial specific rules.

Putting in Perspective Human-Machine System Theory and Modeling: From Theoretical Biology to Artifacts Integrative Design and Organization

“…We have defined the relation of three pair of invariant as Architecture{structure, function}; Behavior{Function, Evoution} and Evolution{Structure, Dynamics}. We have considered these three relation as three plane of an Euclidian space [27], were each invariant was a structuring axis for a system model. Nevertheless that epistemic framework of invariants was a mistake because structure and architecture are equal and function, as an issue of purpose and teleology, is not realy existing per se, it is related to a structural shape (a Gestalt) and the dynamic of the system.…”

Co-Simulation of Cyber Physical Systems with HMI for Human in the Loop Investigation

“…In (Gopalakrishna et al 2017), dealing with machine-learning for human in the loop CPS, a new way of determining the accuracy of an output based on a relevance score taking into account the variability and bios of the human perception. Similar for most research in Human CPS (Gopalakrishna et al 2017, Nunes et al 2015, Lieber and Fass 2011, is the acknowledgement of multidisciplinary technical challenges and argument that the traditional development process, where human impact is not an integrated part of the process, will not be sufficient for future products. Multiple co-simulation frameworks and tools for investigating CPS are available.…”