2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human sound localization at near-threshold levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
50
4
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
50
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Psychophysical data were collected from 7 normal human subjects using 16 spatial locations and 4 absolute stimulus intensities. These data were consistent with previous reports of the effects of intensity on sound localization performance in both humans (23)(24)(25)(26) and monkeys (27). The localization results are summarized across subjects in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Psychophysical data were collected from 7 normal human subjects using 16 spatial locations and 4 absolute stimulus intensities. These data were consistent with previous reports of the effects of intensity on sound localization performance in both humans (23)(24)(25)(26) and monkeys (27). The localization results are summarized across subjects in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in contrast to models using spike rate as well as spike timing and pattern, wherein ipsilateral locations are discriminated as well as contralateral locations (e.g., 14,[16][17]. Second, sound localization ability is degraded at low stimulus intensities (23)(24)(25)(26)(27). The results from this study also demonstrate an influence of stimulus intensity on sound localization ability that was consistent across all studied subjects.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is likely due to the ability to recruit more neurons to provide information about stimulus location as more neurons are activated by the greater spectral energy of the stimulus. The second basic stimulus parameter is the intensity of the stimulus, with low-intensity stimuli being most difficult to localize and louder stimuli more easily localized (e.g., Altshuler & Comalli 1975, Comalli & Altshuler 1976, Recanzone & Beckerman 2004, Sabin et al 2005, Su & Recanzone 2001. Again, as the louder sounds will engage a greater population of neurons, it is possible that the size of the neuronal pool is important in processing acoustic space information.…”
Section: Sound Localization Psychophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cues also require that the stimulus be loud enough to permit detection of all of the decreases in energy, or notches. Thus, pure tone stimuli are extremely difficult to localize in elevation (e.g., Recanzone et al 2000b), as are very-low-intensity stimuli (e.g., Recanzone & Beckerman 2004, Sabin et al 2005, Su & Recanzone 2001. Because the spectral bandwidth of neurons in the primary auditory cortex can be quite narrow (Recanzone et al 2000a), a population-coding scheme is necessary to encode acoustic space at the cortical level.…”
Section: Monaural Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%