CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1753846.1754132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human social response toward humanoid robot's head and facial features

Abstract: This study explores how people's social response toward a humanoid robot can change when we vary the number of the active degrees of freedom in the robot's head and face area. We investigate this problem by conducting two wizard-of-oz user studies that situate an elder person in a self-disclosure dialogue with a remotely operated robot. In our first study, we investigated the effect of expressive head gestures with a four-degree-of-freedom neck. In the second study we focused on the face where we investigated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a few attempts to endow robots with human-like features so that humans will find it easier to trust them. These include matching human likeness (Mathur and Reichling, 2016 ), behavior (Goetz et al, 2003 ), head movement and facial characteristics (gaze and eyelid movements) (Lee and Breazeal, 2010 ), and gestures (Tang et al, 2014 ). An earlier study (Verberne et al, 2015 ) showed that a significant characteristic that influences user trust is the similarity (looks, acts, and thinks) between the user and an artificial agent (Siegel et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a few attempts to endow robots with human-like features so that humans will find it easier to trust them. These include matching human likeness (Mathur and Reichling, 2016 ), behavior (Goetz et al, 2003 ), head movement and facial characteristics (gaze and eyelid movements) (Lee and Breazeal, 2010 ), and gestures (Tang et al, 2014 ). An earlier study (Verberne et al, 2015 ) showed that a significant characteristic that influences user trust is the similarity (looks, acts, and thinks) between the user and an artificial agent (Siegel et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the recovery of social psychology effects using an ECA is an indirect method of evaluation. If an ECA or robot is regarded and treated in human-like ways, then it should be possible to observe phenomena such as social inhibition of return, the social Simon effect (Stenzel et al 2012), chameleon effect (Bailenson and Yee 2005), and effects of non-verbal cues on trust (DeSteno et al 2012; Lee and Brezeal 2010). Experiment 1 investigates the hypothesis that behavioral mimicry increases affinity and liking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar effect could be expected with mediator robots because the effect of non-verbal cues of humans exchanged via the robots can be controlled. In addition, expressive behaviors of social robots encourage self-disclosure [32,37], and social behaviors such as greetings, nodding, and blinks are more acceptable for elderly people [22]. When topics are not so intimate for individuals (e.g., everyday experiences or their own positive memories), it is easy for them to disclose regardless of communication media.…”
Section: Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%