Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Electrical, Automation and Mechanical Engineering (EAME 2017) 2017
DOI: 10.2991/eame-17.2017.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Robot Collaboration Using Industrial Robots

Abstract: Abstract-Human-Robot Collaboration aims at exploiting the different but complementary skills of both the human worker and the programmable machine. It requires a high degree of interaction between the two actors and it is accomplished by special devoted robots. The study shows it is possible to redesign existing industrial robotic cells for executing a number of collaborative actions, respecting safety requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reuse of existing, comprehensive resources of these characteristics allow a high flexibility in the type of requests that can be directed towards the system. Furthermore, the domain is represented by making use of ontologies, which allow a detailed modelling of the scenario and reduce ambiguity between different agents (in this case, human and target system) [24]. Nevertheless, it has some limitations in terms of dialogue (it is only unidirectional at the moment) and the reported implementation does not include variants (i.e., synonyms) for the different terms involved in the interaction (e.g., objects).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reuse of existing, comprehensive resources of these characteristics allow a high flexibility in the type of requests that can be directed towards the system. Furthermore, the domain is represented by making use of ontologies, which allow a detailed modelling of the scenario and reduce ambiguity between different agents (in this case, human and target system) [24]. Nevertheless, it has some limitations in terms of dialogue (it is only unidirectional at the moment) and the reported implementation does not include variants (i.e., synonyms) for the different terms involved in the interaction (e.g., objects).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for the natural language understanding component, most modern taskoriented dialogue systems are somewhat based in frames, which consist of a representation on the information to be provided as slots, to be filled with the information provided by the user [8] and supported by a knowledge base [9]. To assure the correct interpretation for a given command in this kind of dialogue systems, natural language technologies are used in several solutions in the literature [10,11]. Classical architectures made use of rules to detect the intent of the user and to perform slot filling, mainly semantic grammars, as it can be seen in [9], or templates [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In current approaches, ontologies have also been considered both for the natural language understanding and the dialogue management components of task-oriented dialogue systems, as they are a powerful tool that allows to define in detail the domain and reduce ambiguity between agents [10]. However, most dialogue systems that use ontologies found in the literature are limited to highly specific use cases and mainly to model the domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation