1981
DOI: 10.1515/9781400854295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Rights and United States Policy Toward Latin America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
9

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Both actions were specifically aimed at weakening the capacity of Somoza to abuse his population through his campaign against the FSLN. However, according to Schoultz (1981), Carter's sanctions galvanized opposition to the Somoza regime, particularly given that Somoza's repressive apparatus was losing support from the U.S. 7 This analysis suggests that the export restriction on police and military equipment to Nicaragua undermined Somoza's efforts to suppress the nascent FSLN, allowed them to transition from terrorists to a full blown guerrilla insurgency, and ultimately contributed to the collapse of the Somoza regime. In this case, Carter's sanctions against Nicaragua clearly undermined the U.S. goal of containing Communist subversives in the country.…”
Section: The Effect Of Sanctions On Terrorist Group Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Both actions were specifically aimed at weakening the capacity of Somoza to abuse his population through his campaign against the FSLN. However, according to Schoultz (1981), Carter's sanctions galvanized opposition to the Somoza regime, particularly given that Somoza's repressive apparatus was losing support from the U.S. 7 This analysis suggests that the export restriction on police and military equipment to Nicaragua undermined Somoza's efforts to suppress the nascent FSLN, allowed them to transition from terrorists to a full blown guerrilla insurgency, and ultimately contributed to the collapse of the Somoza regime. In this case, Carter's sanctions against Nicaragua clearly undermined the U.S. goal of containing Communist subversives in the country.…”
Section: The Effect Of Sanctions On Terrorist Group Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the so-called 'Latin Americans' lived in contexts where American discourses on Latin America were perceived (when they were at all) mostly as a foreign product that did not necessarily impinge on their identities as Peruvians, Guatemalans, Argentineans, Brazilians, etc. This does not mean, however, that they did not suffer the consequences of such discourses, which were used to justify American political and military intervention (Schoultz, 1998;Smith, 1996), cooperation with dictatorial rulers (Schoultz, 1981), repressive police forces (Huggins, 1998), anti-democratic military and rightwing guerrilla organizations (Berger, 1995).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outra forma, menos asséptica, de enxergar o SIDH, e por consequência os próprios direitos humanos, seria assumi-los como luta pela afirmação de determinados valores e identidades e enquanto espaço-ação permeado e definido em razão dos (DONNELLY, 1986(DONNELLY, , 2003FORSYTHE, 1991;FARER, 1988;SHOULTZ, 1981), na ausência significativa do Canadá (STEVENSON, 1994;FRANÇA, 2013) Os aqui denominados Estados "em cima do muro" se diferenciam dos demais Estados engajados no SIDH em razão de sua objeção circunstancial 5 à jurisdição da Corte IDH. Compõem esse grupo 6 : Antígua e Barbuda, Bahamas, Belize, Canadá, Cuba, Dominica, Estados Unidos, Guiana, Granada, Jamaica, São Cristóvão e Nevis, Santa Lucia e São Vicente e Granadinas.…”
Section: Sidh: Espaço De Disputas Políticasunclassified