2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human resources training: A bibliometric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It employs multiple mathematical and statistical techniques to analyze the literature characteristics of a particular topic; assess the performance of authors, institutions, countries/regions, and journals; discover research hot spots; and uncover future research trends [21]. Such techniques comprise co-authorship analysis, co-occurrence analysis, citation and co-citation analysis, and the mapping of the knowledge domain [22]. It should be noted that although bibliometric analysis can extract and visualize key information from a large number of documents and provide an objective reference for retrospective analysis, it cannot replace systematic manual reviews [19,23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It employs multiple mathematical and statistical techniques to analyze the literature characteristics of a particular topic; assess the performance of authors, institutions, countries/regions, and journals; discover research hot spots; and uncover future research trends [21]. Such techniques comprise co-authorship analysis, co-occurrence analysis, citation and co-citation analysis, and the mapping of the knowledge domain [22]. It should be noted that although bibliometric analysis can extract and visualize key information from a large number of documents and provide an objective reference for retrospective analysis, it cannot replace systematic manual reviews [19,23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a further refinement, as a first exclusion criterion, we shortlisted only articles available in the English language (Tian, Geng, Sarkis, & Zhong, 2018). We also decided to select only journal articles and reviews since formally subjected to a double‐blind peer‐review process to ensure a high standard of papers included in the final sample (Danvila‐del‐Valle, Estévez‐Mendoza, & Lara, 2019). In this line, as a second exclusion criterion, we excluded conference proceedings, editorial material, meeting abstracts, early access, and corrections.…”
Section: Methods Data Collection and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliometrics studies have been conducted by researches in various fields and expertise (Keramatfar & Amikhani, 2019;Mulet-Forteza, Genovart-Balaguer, Mauleon-Mendez & Merigo, 2018;Noorhidawati, Aspura, Zahila & Abrizah;Zupic & Cater, 2015). Over the years, bibliometrics studies expanded into social sciences research such as accounting (Zhong, Geng, Liu, Gao & Chen, 2016;Merigo & Yang, 2017), management (Danvila-del-Valle, Estévez-Mendoza & Lara, 2019;Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Podsakoff & Bachrach, 2008), economics (Baltagi, 2007;Coupe, 2003), business and communication (Chen, Wang, Tang & Hao, 2019;Salimi, Tavasoli, Gilani, Jouyandeh & Sadjadi, 2019), entrepreneurship (Hota, Subramanian & Narayanamurthy, 2019;Vallaster, Kraus, Lindahl & Nielsen, 2019), strategic management (Ferreira, Santos, de Almeida & Reis, 2014;Vogel & Guttel, 2013) and in broader marketing research (Fetscherin & Heinrich, 2015;Kim & McMillan, 2008;Samiee & Chabowski, 2012) has also been increasingly engaged in bibliometric citations research publications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%