2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep28087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Protein Subcellular Localization with Integrated Source and Multi-label Ensemble Classifier

Abstract: Predicting protein subcellular location is necessary for understanding cell function. Several machine learning methods have been developed for computational prediction of primary protein sequences because wet experiments are costly and time consuming. However, two problems still exist in state-of-the-art methods. First, several proteins appear in different subcellular structures simultaneously, whereas current methods only predict one protein sequence in one subcellular structure. Second, most software tools a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental result denotes that our proposed method works better than all the traditional methods used in [13]. Our proposed method achieves 69.1% average precision, almost 15% higher than MLKNN, which is the best result in [13]. Our method achieves higher Micro-averaged F-Measure score than traditional methods, about 16% improvement.…”
Section: ) Rank-based Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental result denotes that our proposed method works better than all the traditional methods used in [13]. Our proposed method achieves 69.1% average precision, almost 15% higher than MLKNN, which is the best result in [13]. Our method achieves higher Micro-averaged F-Measure score than traditional methods, about 16% improvement.…”
Section: ) Rank-based Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The higher value, the better performance: Table 1 shows the comparison result of our model with several traditional methods, such as MLKNN and BRKNN. The experimental result denotes that our proposed method works better than all the traditional methods used in [13]. Our proposed method achieves 69.1% average precision, almost 15% higher than MLKNN, which is the best result in [13].…”
Section: ) Rank-based Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, MRF − l t M . This process is repeated iteratively until the convergence of the pseudo-likelihood Equation 10. We name these MRFs as collective MRFs (see Figure 2 and algorithm 1).…”
Section: Collective Mrfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein features, especially the sequence-based features, are always the essential part in various protein SCL predictors [4,7,10]. To carry out di erent functions, one protein can be located in di erent SubCellular Compartments (SCCs) simultaneously or at di erent times during di erent biological processes, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%