2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Cancer Prevention in Japan and Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
46
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HPV-58 is not rare in Asian women with normal cervical cytology; its prevalence being <1% in Thailand, Vietnam, Japan and Korea (Domingo et al, 2008;Konno et al, 2008) and 1~2% in Taiwan and China (Shi et al, 2008;Tay et al, 2008). Among SCCA patients, a condensation of HPV-58 infection (about 26%) was reported in Shanghai (Huang et al, 1997), whereas it reached 18% in Khon Kaen (present study; Sriamporn et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…HPV-58 is not rare in Asian women with normal cervical cytology; its prevalence being <1% in Thailand, Vietnam, Japan and Korea (Domingo et al, 2008;Konno et al, 2008) and 1~2% in Taiwan and China (Shi et al, 2008;Tay et al, 2008). Among SCCA patients, a condensation of HPV-58 infection (about 26%) was reported in Shanghai (Huang et al, 1997), whereas it reached 18% in Khon Kaen (present study; Sriamporn et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Recently, the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has increased in Korea, resulting in a continued, high burden of cervical cancer (Konno et al, 2008). Although two HPV vaccines are available in Korea, the cost of including them in the National Immunization program is prohibitive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, continuous efforts to expand participation in cervical cancer screening are still required. Increasing the uptake of cervical cancer screening is especially important because even though the ICER of adding vaccination to the Pap smear screening would be an cost-effective option, women of low socioeconomic status are less likely to participate in screening or to be able to afford the vaccination (Konno et al, 2008;Park et al, 2011;Praditsitthikorn et al, 2011;Yamamoto et al, 2012). The cost-effectiveness of vaccination in combination with frequent or infrequent screening by the NCSP needs to be evaluated, in light of young women's low screening participation rate and :http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4329 Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Recently, the HPV-DNA screening test has attracted public attention, especially in developing countries, as a potentially more cost-effective alternative to the Pap smear (Levin et al, 2010;Flores et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations