2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2018.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human papillomavirus detection using PCR and ATR-FTIR for cervical cancer screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The greatest benefit of FTIR technique lies in its highly sensitive acquisition of the whole ‘-omics’ of a biological sample, which enables the detection of molecular changes that may reflect the onset and progression of a disease, thus enabling disease diagnosis and monitoring [ 29 ]. Up to now, this technique has been widely used in the medical field for cancer diagnoses, such as skin [ 30 ], breast [ 31 , 32 ], cervical [ 33 ], colon [ 34 ] and kidney tumors [ 35 ], detections of antibiotics’ resistant Escherichia coli bacteria [ 36 ], human papillomavirus [ 37 ] and malaria infected red blood cells [ 38 ], and monitoring of tendinopathy [ 39 ] and chronic venous leg ulcer exudates [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest benefit of FTIR technique lies in its highly sensitive acquisition of the whole ‘-omics’ of a biological sample, which enables the detection of molecular changes that may reflect the onset and progression of a disease, thus enabling disease diagnosis and monitoring [ 29 ]. Up to now, this technique has been widely used in the medical field for cancer diagnoses, such as skin [ 30 ], breast [ 31 , 32 ], cervical [ 33 ], colon [ 34 ] and kidney tumors [ 35 ], detections of antibiotics’ resistant Escherichia coli bacteria [ 36 ], human papillomavirus [ 37 ] and malaria infected red blood cells [ 38 ], and monitoring of tendinopathy [ 39 ] and chronic venous leg ulcer exudates [ 40 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Viana et al [ 13 ] showed the possibility of distinguishing HPV infected samples from normal samples with 76% efficiency. Interestingly, the study by Rymsza et al [ 14 ] showed that FTIR could not distinguish between samples identified as low/high risk by cytology, but PCR showed that all samples contained HPV, proving that FTIR results were more accurate compared to cytology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that vaginal cells, self-collected using a simple cotton swab and further self-smeared on a glass slide, can be valid sample for HR-HPV detection with PCR [12]. Lately, various PCR-based techniques have been developed to detect HR-HPV DNA but few allow for low-cost detection [1318]. The PCR GP5+/6+, which targets the L1 region of the HPV genome, coupled with an enzymatic immunoassay (GP-EIA) has been extensively studied and used in different clinical settings, giving good results [1921].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%