Human Health Risks of Conducted Electrical Weapon Exposure

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Conducted electrical weapons (CEWs) are used broadly as a less-lethal force option for police officers. However, there is no clear picture of the possible health risks in humans on the basis of rigorously assessed scientific evidence from the international peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVE To synthesize and systematically evaluate the strength of published evidence for an association between exposure to different models of CEWs and adverse acute as well as chronic conditions. EVIDENCE REVIEW Following a preregistered review protocol, the literature search strategy was based on a search of reviews published between January 1, 2000, and April 24, 2020, of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library, as well as relevant online databases and bibliographic sources, such as reference sections of recent publications. The identified studies were independently assessed in terms of scope, relevance, methodologic bias, and quality. Peer-reviewed publications of human studies were included, using original data and with a focus on the use of taser CEWs in the context of law enforcement. Eligible studies examined clearly defined health outcomes as dependent variables following exposure to a CEW. The review followed the relevant sections of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. A meta-analysis could not be conducted. FINDINGS Of the 1081 unique records screened, 33 relevant studies were identified, all of them of experimental design and conducted in the US. Eleven studies had a low risk of bias and 22 had a higher bias risk. Studies focused on outcomes such as physiologic stress responses, heart rate, blood pressure, arrhythmias, or cognitive performance. Independently of bias risk, the studies reported few or no acute health problems, apart from the wounds caused by the darts. Furthermore, no longterm outcomes were studied. Most of the studies were performed on healthy, physically fit individuals (eg, police officers) in a controlled setting, with short exposure duration (5 seconds). Half of the studies, mainly those with a higher risk of bias, were at least partly funded by the manufacturer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Based on the findings of the reviewed studies, the risk for adverse health outcomes due to CEW exposure can be currently estimated as low. However, most of the reviewed studies had methodologic limitations. Considering that recruited participants were not representative of the population that usually encounters a CEW deployment, it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding exposure outcomes in potentially vulnerable populations or high-risk groups, such as those under the influence of substances.

Health impact of electric discharge weapons: a review of case studies

“…Studies were all experimental, largely recruiting a small sample of healthy individuals who are unlikely to represent the population exposed to Tasers. The review further found that many studies received funding from the Taser manufacturer (Baliatsas et al, 2021). The finding that there is a need for higher quality research is echoed in other reviews (Semple et al, 2021;Sheppard & Welsh, 2022).…”

“…A 2021 systematic review on the health risks of Tasers found that the risk of adverse outcomes due to use is low (Baliatsas et al, 2021). However, the review also identified methodological and quality issues with most studies.…”

Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities for Managing Potentially Volatile Police–Public Interactions: A Narrative Review

“… Ho et al (2011) found that simply using the laser sighting device, which projects red dots on the individual, prevented interactions with agitated patients from escalating. Ideally, officers should also know what intervention options work best in any given set of circumstances, with respect to both effectiveness and safety ( Baldwin et al, 2018 ; Baliatsas et al, 2021 ; Semple et al, 2021a ).…”

Fatal officer involved shootings following the use of TASER conducted energy weapons

“…For two decades, researchers have explored the physiological effects of the use of TASER ® 1 technology and its relationship to adverse reactions and sudden arrest-related deaths (Kroll, 2009; Vilke et al, 2007; Williams, 2008; Webster et al, 2006; Werner et al, 2012). Physiological research has examined cardiac, respiratory, and metabolic effects (Baliatsas et al, 2021; Bozeman et al, 2009; Jauchem et al, 2009). More recently, research has centered on the effects of associated trauma, such as injuries from uncontrolled falls, from the ignition of volatile fumes, and from impacts to the eyes (Gapsis et al, 2017; Kroll et al, 2016; Kroll et al, 2017).…”