Human health in systemic adaptation to climate change: insights from flood risk management in a river basin

Abstract

Human health risks in dealing with floods in a river basin in SouthWestern Finland are analysed as an example of scientific and practical challenges in systemic adaptation to climate change and in integrated governance of water resources. The analysis is based on case reports and plans, on literature studies and on conceptual models of risks and risk management. Flood risks in the Northern European study area are aggravated by melt-and storm-water runoff, ice jams and coastal flooding. Flood risk assessment is linked with management plans based on EU directives as applied in the case area. National risk management policies and procedures of increasing scope and depth have been devised for climate change, water resources and overall safety, but an integrated approach to health risks is still largely missing. The same is true of surveys of perceived flood risks, and participatory deliberation and collaborative planning procedures for flood risk management in the case area, specifically for adaptive lake regulation. Health impacts, risks and benefits, socioeconomic and systemic risks, and overarching prevention, adaptation and compensation measures are not fully included. We propose a systematic framework for these extensions. Particular attention needs to be given to health risks due to flooding, e.g. from water contamination, moist buildings, mental stress and infrastructure damage and also from management actions. Uncertainties and ambiguities about risks present continuing challenges. It is concluded that health aspects of flooding are complex and need to be better included in assessment and control, to develop more integrated and adaptive systemic risk governance.

Plant growth-promoting microbes improve stormwater retention of a newly-built vertical greenery system

“…In 2021 alone, urban flooding reached unprecedented catastrophic levels in Europe, causing deaths and widespread damage (Bosseler et al, 2021;Fekete and Sandholz, 2021). In Finland, occasional intensive precipitation, particularly in July and August, affects residents and the economy (Aalto et al, 2016;Votsis, 2017;Assmuth et al, 2020). Urban green infrastructure is a sustainable, effective, and economic bioretention method to manage stormwater (Jayasooriya and Ng, 2014).…”

Nordic hydrological frontier in the 21st century

“…The combination of large latitudinal gradients within the region, the wide range of altitudes, the coverage of three vital biomes (temperate, boreal, and tundra), and coastal ecosystems representing three different seas (Baltic Sea, Atlantic Ocean, and Arctic Ocean) create a large variety of characteristics, potential impacts, and future risks in the region. Risks can relate directly to water availability on the surface and underground (Kløve et al 2014), or indirectly to a specific context where water is relevant, such as healthy ecosystems and human well-being (Assmuth et al 2020). Hydro-climatological changes in water resources also impact energy production and demand, where both temperature (demand) and precipitation (hydropower production) play a role.…”

Concurrent threats and disasters: modeling and managing risk and resilience

“…They describe survey results which provide insights into how legal liability concerns impact hazard and incident reporting, and thus disaster prevention. Assmuth et al ( 2020 ) describe approaches taken in Finland related to minimizing the impacts associated with flooding, especially related to the potential health impacts associated with flood events. Renwick ( 2020 ) applies a decision model to the topic of food security, which is an essential societal function which can be disrupted by disasters.…”