Human Head Dynamic Response to Side Impact by Finite Element Modeling

Abstract

The dynamic response of the human head to side impact was studied by 2-dimensional finite element modeling. Three models were formulated in this study. Model I is an axisymmetric model. It simulated closed shell impact of the human head, and consisted of a single-layered spherical shell filled wiht an inviscid fluid. The other two models (Model II and III) are plane strain models of a coronal section of the human head. Model II approximated a 50th percentile male head by an outer layer to simulate cranial bone and an inviscid interior core to simulate the intracranial contents. The configuration of Model III is the same as Model II but more detailed anatomical features of the head interior were added, such as, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF); falx cerebri, dura, and tentorium. Linear elastic material properties were assigned to all three models. All three models were loaded by a triangular pulse with a peak pressure of 40 kPa, effectively producing a peak force of 1954 N (440 lb). The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of the membranes and that of the mechanical properties of the skull, brain, and membrane on the dynamic response of the brain during side impact, and to compare the pressure distributions from the plane strain model with the axisymmetric model. A parametric study was conducted on Model II to characterize fully its response to impact under various conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

In vivo imaging of rapid deformation and strain in an animal model of traumatic brain injury

“…Bain and Meaney (2000) determined thresholds for injury in the guinea pig optic nerve in terms of strain. Finite element models of the human head and brain have also been developed (e.g., Ruan et al, 1991;Zhang et al, 2001), but validation against quantitative, spatially resolved, strain data is still lacking.…”

An asymptotic method for the prediction of the anisotropic effective elastic properties of the cortical vein: superior sagittal sinus junction embedded within a homogenized cell element

“…This experimental work coupled with an FEM modal analysis using springs and dashpots based on rheological models enabled the evaluation of an equivalent stiffness of the BSIR zone, which was 0.012 MPa. It appears to be of the same order as the average stiffness values of the brain, measured between 0.07 MPa and 0.675 MPa [Ruan et al 1991;Willinger et al 1992;Kumaresan and Radhakrishnan 1996;Ruan and Prasad 1996;Sarkar et al 2004]. However it is much smaller than the stiffness value of the skull, measured at 15 GPa for parietal bone and 4 GPa for the diploë [Willinger et al 1999 Yao et al 2008;Yu et al 2008].…”

Wave Propagation in a System of Coaxial Tubes Filled With Incompressible Media: A Model of Pulse Transmission in the Intracranial Arteries

“…We are interested in pulse propagation in the craniospinal cavity; the craniospinal cavity is confined by the skull and vertebrae, and filled by the nervous tissue, blood vessels, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which are all largely comprised of water, and are thus essentially incompressible (Ruan et al 1991). Since the skull and vertebrae are effectively rigid, it is routinely assumed that the total cranial volume does not change.…”