Human Development as Transformative Practice

Abstract

This article compares the development experiences of two societiesKerala (a state within India) and Cuba -both widely regarded by development experts as "success stories" in the Global South for their relatively high achievements in general quality of life and social well-being as measured by UN Development Program's indicators of human development. The author argues that the lessons offered by Kerala and Cuba in rapidly alleviating endemic deprivations and enhancing human development are of enormous significance for developing countries. Indeed their experience is of particular relevance in the context of the structural adjustment programs imposed on southern countries by the Bretton Woods institutions and in the wake of the clear failures of alternative models to reduce hunger and deprivation. Examining the historical trajectory of these two "models" and the transformative practice that produced relatively high human development outcomes, the article identifies some common elements behind their success, highlighting the centrality of public action and organized democratic participation. It also examines some of the major challenges Kerala and Cuba face in the aftermath of globalization and market reforms. Although they have been successful in achieving higher economic growth, Kerala and Cuba now confront problems created by privatization, increasing inequality, and eroding public services that threaten their development models. While the two societies are facing these challenges in different ways and are still sustaining their basic social welfare programs, their experience in meeting these challenges is important for the developing world facing similar challenges."Walker, there is no road. The road is made as you walk." -Antonio Machado, Spanish poet Critical Asian Studies

COVID-19 in India: A Comparative Analysis of the Kerala and Gujarat Development Models’ Initial Responses

“…In fact, despite local government becoming more involved in the policy making process, the proactive nature of policy making in the state ensures that Kerala maintains a level of social development that is 'not only decades ahead of India, but on par with the middle-developed countries', for example, Brazil or argentina (Chathukulam and Tharamangalom, 2021: 9) Well-organized, broad-based social movements are another feature of the Kerala model that has helped in its success. Social movements in Kerala predate the creation of the Indian state in 1947 and go back to the nineteenth century, when southern Kerala consisted of the princely states of Travancore and Cochin, both of which had a long history of social reform movements and anti-caste associations (Tharamangalam, 2010). These reform-oriented organizations would later become trade unions and socialist movements, resulting in a mobilized 'socially and politically conscious population' and the establishment of strong political parties (Chathukulam and Tharamangalam, 2021: 9).…”

Surviving in Contemporary Kerala: Reflections from Recent Research in a Fisher Village

“…Thresia () notes a serious decline in several key health indicators after 2000. Others highlight not just the ‘diminished capacity of the state for public provisioning’, but also ‘the diminished capacity of the public to act’ to press for gains in social development (Tharamangalam, : 396).…”